The Influence of Body Mass Index on Efficacy and Outcomes of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery (PTES) for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Author:

Zhuang Chenyang1,Xu Yun2,Qian Cheng1,Lin Hong3,Gu Yutong1

Affiliation:

1. Zhongshan Hospital

2. Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital

3. Shanghai Geriatrics Centre

Abstract

Abstract

Background To investigate and quantify the influence of body mass index (BMI) on the efficacy and outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES), a novel minimally invasive surgical technique in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods A total of 55 patients suffering from single-level LDH with or without high iliac crest, scoliosis or calcification, who underwent PTES in our department from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to BMI. The operative events of two groups including X-ray projection, operation time, blood loss and length of stay were compared. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy and outcomes of the surgery. Differences in complications and recurrences between two groups were also analyzed. Results 55 patients were divided into obese and nonobese groups according to their BMI (33.03 vs 23.07). There was no significant difference in X-ray projection (times), operation time (mins), blood loss (mL) and length of stay (days) between two groups (7/5–11 vs 5/5–10, 58.17 ± 9.20 vs 53.65 ± 10.06, 6.41 ± 1.43 vs 5.50 ± 2.45, 3.17 ± 1.44 vs 2.96 ± 0.53, P > 0.05). Both groups demonstrated a significant decrease in ODI (12.01 ± 3.57% vs 67.16 ± 9.25%, 13.92 ± 4.24% vs 68.10 ± 9.27%, P < 0.05) and VAS (0.10 ± 0.48 vs 8.38 ± 0.94, 0.22 ± 0.56 vs 8.38 ± 0.86) at 24 months after the operation compared with which at the preoperative status. No significant difference in the improvement of the clinical outcomes was found between the two groups in ODI or VAS (P > 0.05). Conclusions With the simple orientation, easy puncture and reduced steps, PTES is an effective and safe method to both obese and normal patients with LDH.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3