Affiliation:
1. The First Hospital of China Medical University
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The combination of PD-1 inhibitors with paclitaxel/cisplatinum (PD-1 + TP) and fluoropyrimidine/cisplatinum (PD-1 + FP) both have been shown to improve overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with previously untreated, advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, there is no consensus on which chemotherapy regimen combined with PD-1 has better efficacy. To address this important issue in the first-line treatment of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, we conducted a network meta-analysis.
Methods
Data were collected from eligible studies searched in Medline, Web of Science, Pubmed, the Cochrane Library and Embase. Pooled Hazard Ratio (HR) for OS, and PFS, Odds Ratio (OR) for objective response rate (ORR) and ≥ 3grade treatment-related adverse events (≥ 3TRAEs) were estimated to evaluate the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors combined with TP or FP.
Results
Five RCTs and one retrospective study involving 3685 patients and evaluating 4 treatments were included in this network meta-analysis. Compared to other treatments, PD-1 + TP was better. For PFS, the HRs for PD-1 + TP compared to PD-1 + FP, TP and FP were 0.59 (0.44, 0.80), 0.56 (0.51, 0.61) and 0.45 (0.37, 0.56) respectively. For OS, PD-1 + TP was also a better treatment compared to other treatments, the HRs were 0.74 (0.56, 0.96), 0.64 (0.57, 0.71), 0.53 (0.43, 0.67) respectively. For ORR, there was no significant difference between PD-1 + TP and PD-1 + FP, ORs were 1.2 (0.69, 2.11). Compare with TP and FP, PD-1 + TP has a obvious advantage, ORs were 2.5 (2.04, 3.04) and 2.95 (1.91, 4.63). For ≥ 3TRAEs, PD-1 + TP compared to other treatments, OR were 1.34 (0.74, 2.46) and 1.13 (0.92, 1.38) and 2.23 (1.35, 3.69).
Conclusion
PD-1 + TP significantly improved both PFS and OS compared to PD-1 + FP. Taking into account both efficacy and safety, PD-1 + TP may be a superior first-line treatment option for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4. PMID: 33538338.
2. Pennathur A, Gibson MK, Jobe BA, Luketich JD. Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet. 2013;381(9864):400 – 12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60643-6. PMID: 23374478.
3. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with or without epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition panitumumab for patients with non-resectable, advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell cancer: a prospective, open-label, randomised phase III AIO/EORTC trial (POWER);Moehler M;Ann Oncol,2020
4. ESCORT-1st Investigators. Effect of Camrelizumab vs Placebo Added to Chemotherapy on Survival and Progression-Free Survival in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The ESCORT-1st Randomized Clinical Trial;Luo H;JAMA,2021
5. Waddell T, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D. Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40(5):584–591. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.020. PMID: 24685156.