Affiliation:
1. University of Birmingham
2. Universidad de Los Andes
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Conflict and violence can impact on the mental health of children and young people, who are in a crucial stage of their personal growth. Not much is known about the provision of mental health care to young people in conflict-affected areas. Community-based care can be essential, as state-led services are often scarce in conflict contexts, like Colombia’s Pacific region where this research was conducted. According to the WHO, such care is ideally provided in the form of a network of interconnected services, offered by different actors beyond the formal health sector.
Methods
Qualitative data were collected through 98 interviews with community organisations, schools, international organisations and schools. These interviews aimed to identify the strategies used to promote young people’s mental health and the interactions between the different providers. Boundary spanning theory was used to analyse how different actors and forms of mental health care provision could coordinate better.
Results
Community organisations and schools use a wide array of strategies to attend to the mental health of children and young people, often of a collective and psychosocial nature. State institutions offer more clinically focused strategies, which are however limited in terms of accessibility and continuity. International organisations aim to strengthen state capacity, but often struggle due to high staff turnover. Although mental health care pathways exist, their effectiveness is limited due to ineffective coordination between actors.
Conclusions
To make sure that the variety of strategies to improve young people’s mental health effectively reach their beneficiaries, better coordination is needed between the different actors. Mental health care pathways should therefore integrate community organisations, while community connectors can help to manage the coordination between different actors and forms of clinical and psychosocial support.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Comisión de la Verdad. No Hay Futuro si No Hay Verdad: Informe Final. Bogotá: Comisión para el Esclarecimiento de la Verdad la Convivencia y la No Repetición; 2022.
2. De Gamboa Tapias C, Díaz Pabón FA. The Transitional Justice Framework Agreed Between the Colombian Government and the FARC-EP. In: Díaz Pabón FA, editor. Truth, Justice and Reconciliation in Colombia: Transitioning from Violence. Abingdon: Routledge; 2018. pp. 66–84.
3. Comisión de la Verdad. Colombia Adentro: Relatos territoriales sobre el conflicto armado. Pacífico. Bogotá: Comisión para el Esclarecimiento de la Verdad la Convivencia y la No Repetición; 2022.
4. Pares. Más Sombras que Luces: La Seguridad en Colombia a un año del Gobierno de Iván Duque. Bogotá: Fundación Paz & Reconciliación - Pares; 2019.
5. Towards violent peace? Territorial dynamics of violence in Tumaco (Colombia) before and after the demobilisation of the FARC-EP. Confl Secur Dev;Salas Salazar LG,2019