Abstract
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study was to collect pilot efficacy data on a novel treatment for refractory chronic cough (RCC), which we call cough desensitization treatment (CDT).
Design and Methods
In this parallel cohort, sham-controlled, randomized controlled trial, 21 adults with RCC were randomly assigned to 12 sessions of either CDT (progressive doses of aerosolized capsaicin while behaviorally suppressing cough; n = 11) or a sham treatment (repeated exposure to aerosolized saline; n = 9). The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) was the primary outcome measure. Perceived cough severity with a visual analogue scale and cough challenge testing (for measuring cough-reflex sensitivity) were secondary outcome measures. Data were analyzed with mixed effects linear regression and follow-up contrasts.
Results
Results on all measures favored CDT. Excluding one sham participant, whose baseline LCQ scores were deemed unreliable, mean change in LCQ at 3-weeks post treatment was 6.35 and 2.17 in the CDT and sham groups, respectively. There was moderate to strong evidence of a greater improvement in the CDT group in total LCQ score (p = .058) and LCQ Psychological domain (p = .026) and Physical domain (p = .045) scores. Strong evidence was found for a greater reduction in urge-to-cough during CCT in the CDT group (p = .037) and marginal for a reduction in the capsaicin cough-reflex sensitivity (p = .094). There was weak evidence of a greater reduction in cough severity in the CDT group (p = .103).
Discussion
Although the study is limited due to the small sample size, the data provide additional evidence supporting further research on CDT. CDT resulted in a greater change in the primary efficacy measure (LCQ) than both pharmaceutical and behavioral treatments currently found in the literature.
Trial Registration
This trial (NCT05226299) was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov on 07/02/2022.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference71 articles.
1. Prevelance, pathogensis, and causes of chronic cough;Chung KF;Lancet,2008
2. The global epidemiology of chronic cough in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Song WJ;Eur Respir J,2015
3. Impact of chronic cough on quality of life;French CL;Arch Intern Med,1998
4. French C, Crawford S, Bova C, Irwin S. R. Change in psychologic, physiologic, and situational factors in adults after treatment of chronic cough.Chest. 2017;152.
5. Chronic cough: epidemiology;Morice AH;Chronic Resp Dis,2008