Community and Partner Engagement in Dissemination and Implementation Research at the National Institutes of Health: An Analysis of Recently Funded Studies and Opportunities to Advance the Field

Author:

Villalobos Aubrey V1ORCID,Blachman-Demner Dara R2,Percy-Laurry Antoinette3,Belis Deshirée2,Bhattacharya Manami1

Affiliation:

1. National Cancer Institute

2. Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research

3. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities

Abstract

Abstract Background: As the focus has grown in recent years on both engaged research and dissemination and implementation (D&I) research, so too has federal funding to support these areas. The purpose of this analysis is to provide an overall perspective about the range of practices and approaches being used to engage partners in D&I research, with special attention to disparities-relevant research, and to identify gaps and opportunities in research funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) in this space. Methods: This analysis examined a portfolio of active D&I research grants funded in fiscal years 2020 and 2021 across the NIH. Grant applications were deductively coded and summary statistics were calculated. Cross-tabulations were used to identify trends by engagement and disparities foci. Results: There were 103 grants included in the portfolio, of which 87% contained some form of community or partner engagement, and 50% of engaged grants were relevant to health disparities. Engagement was planned across the research continuum with each study engaging on average 2.5 different partner types. Consultation was the most common level of engagement (56%) while partnership was the least common (3%). On average, each study used 2.2 engagement strategies. Only 16% of grants indicated formally measuring engagement. Compared to non-disparities studies, disparities-relevant studies were about twice as likely to engage partners at the higher levels of partnership or collaboration and were also more likely to be conducted in community settings (26% vs. 5%). Conclusions: Based on this portfolio analysis, D&I research appears to regularly integrate engagement approaches and strategies, though opportunities to deepen engagement and diversify who is engaged remain. This manuscript outlines several gaps in the portfolio and describes opportunities for increasing engagement to improve the quality of D&I research and application to advancing health equity. In addition, opportunities for leveraging the consistent and systematic application of engagement approaches and strategies to advance the science of engagement are discussed.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference55 articles.

1. PAR-19-274. : Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health (R01 Clinical Trial Optional) [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 28]. Available from: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-19-274.html

2. PAR-19-276. : Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health (R03 Clinical Trial Not Allowed) [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 28]. Available from: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-19-276.html

3. PAR-19-275. : Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health (R21 Clinical Trial Optional) [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 28]. Available from: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-19-275.html

4. SIHH | NIH Center for Scientific Review [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 28]. Available from: https://public.csr.nih.gov/StudySections/DABP/HSS/SIHH

5. 2022 D&I. - About | AcademyHealth [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 28]. Available from: https://academyhealth.org/page/2022-di-about

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3