Interprofessional cooperation and job satisfaction in German intensive care units - a cross-sectional survey within the PRiVENT project

Author:

Fleischhauer Thomas1,Biehler Elena1,Michels Julia D.2,Trudzinski Franziska2,Schubert-Haack Janina3,Forstner Johanna1,Schneider Armin4,Kempa Axel5,Joves Biljana5,Neurohr Claus6,Herth Felix JF2,Szecsenyi Joachim1,Wensing Michel1

Affiliation:

1. Heidelberg University, Heidelberg University Hospital

2. Thoraxklinik Heidelberg gGmbH, Member of the German Centre of Lung Research (DZL)

3. aQua Institute for Applied Quality Promotion and Research in Health Care GmbH

4. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Waldburg-Zeil Kliniken

5. SLK-Klinik Löwenstein

6. Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus Klinik Schillerhöhe

Abstract

Abstract

Background: The PRiVENT study aims to reduce the number of long-term ventilated patients by improving interprofessional collaboration among healthcare professionals. To assess the current state of interprofessional cooperation and job satisfaction in intensive care units, a written survey was conducted among service providers from four clusters, each of which consist of one weaning centre and 7-12 other cooperation hospitals. Methods: The Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale, Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale and the Warr-Cook-Wall Scale were used. In addition to a descriptive analysis, a subgroup analysis was performed comparing scores between physicians and non-physicians and the four clusters. Correlation coefficients were calculated to check for correlations between age group and gender with interprofessional collaboration and work satisfaction. Internal consistency of the questionnaires was assessed via Crohnbach’s Alphas. Analyses were performed using Excel version 1808 and R (version 4.0.3). Results: A total of 60 questionnaires were filled out by health workers at the WCs and CCs participating in the project, corresponding to a response rate of 46%. 36 (59%) questionnaires were completed by physicians and 24 (41%) by the other health professionals. The average work experience was 18.4 ± 11.4 years. Most respondents rated their personal teamwork skills and interprofessional cooperation as good. Job satisfaction was high, particularly regarding the collegial environment and variety of work tasks. Satisfaction with physical workload, income, and working hours was lower. Non-physicians’ ratings were lower for all questionnaires and most items, although the difference in total scores was not statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were observed between clusters. There was a statistically significant positive monotonous correlation between age group and years of work experience with overall work satisfaction. Internal consistency of the questionnaires was excellent. Conclusions: The findings show that staff members are generally satisfied with their workplace conditions and environment and rate their individual team skills and interprofessional cooperation as good. Non-physicians were less satisfied with their working conditions, although the difference was not statistically significant. Future surveys at mid-term and at the end of the intervention period will provide insights into the impact of PRiVENT on interprofessional cooperation and job satisfaction. Registration The study protocol of the PRiVENT study was registered on 02.03.2022 in the German Register of Clinical Trials under the number DRKS00028196.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference47 articles.

1. A WHO report: framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice;Gilbert JH;J Allied Health,2010

2. Interprofessional collaboration in the ICU: how to define?;Rose L;Nurs Crit Care,2011

3. Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative (CIHC). A national interprofessional competency framework. Vancouver: CIHC; 2010.

4. The rules of the game: interprofessional collaboration on the intensive care unit team;Lingard L;Crit Care (London England),2004

5. Interprofessional team member's satisfaction: a mixed methods study of a Chilean hospital;Espinoza P;Hum Resour Health,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3