Perceived health inequalities: Are the UK and US public aware of occupation-related health inequality, and do they wish to see it reduced?

Author:

Bridger Emma K1,Tufte-Hewett Angela2,Comerford David3

Affiliation:

1. University of Leicester

2. Birmingham City University

3. University of Stirling

Abstract

Abstract Background. One underexamined factor in the study of lay views of socioeconomic health inequalities is occupation-related health. Examining health by occupational social class has a long history in the UK but has been comparatively overlooked in US public health literatures. Methods. Representative samples of the UK and US indicated the perceived and ideal lifespan of people working in “higher managerial/professional” and “routine” occupations. We examine perceptions of inequality and desires for equality across occupation groups as a function of country and key socio-demographic variables. Results. 67.8% of UK and 53.7% of US participants identified that professionals live longer than routine workers. Multivariate models indicated that US participants were markedly less likely to be aware of occupation-related inequalities after controlling for age, gender, and education. Awareness was negatively related to age (in the US) and recent voting behaviours (both samples). Desiring equal life expectancy was less likely in the US sample, and less likely across both samples for older participants and those with lower levels of education. Conclusion. There is widespread understanding of the occupation-related gradient in lifespan and a desire that these inequalities be eliminated in the UK, but considerably less awareness and desire for equality in the US.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference60 articles.

1. Smith KE, Bambra KH. C: Health inequalities: Critical perspectives. Oxford: University Press; 2016.

2. Bartley M. Health Inequality: An introduction to concepts, theories and methods. Cambridge: Polity Books; 2017.

3. Can we reduce health inequalities? An analysis of the English strategy (1997–2010);Mackenbach JP;J Epidemiol Community Health,2011

4. Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on;Marmot M;BMJ,2020

5. Pessimistic health and optimistic wealth distributions perceptions in Germany and the UK: evidence from an online-survey;Debbeler LJ;BMC Public Health,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3