Affiliation:
1. Newcastle University
2. Bucharest University of Economic Studies
3. Titu Maiorescu University
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The majority of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) don’t have population norms in Romania. This is the case with the EQ-5D as well. Therefore, we aimed to estimate population norms for the Romanian versions of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L, their indexes, and the EQ-VAS.
Methods
A cross-sectional survey was conducted in all regions of Romania from November 2018 to November 2019. A three-stage probability sampling procedure stratified by region and settlement size was used to select a representative sample. Interviews were computer-assisted and conducted in respondents’ homes by trained interviewers. Health status was assessed with the EQ-5D-5L, the EQ-5D-3L and the EQ-VAS. Descriptive statistics were used to estimate population norms by age groups and sex for the EQ-5D-5L, the EQ-5D-3L, their indexes and the EQ-VAS. Population norms were weighted using survey weights. Indexes for the EQ-5D questionnaires were estimated using the recently developed Romanian value sets.
Results
Data from 1,649 interviews was analysed in the present study. Survey weights were used so that sex and place of residence ratios for the weighted sample matched the Romanian general population distribution. Participants’ mean age was 47.5 years (SD = 17.9) and 50.3% of them reported being in good health. The dimension for which people reported the fewest problems for both questionnaires was the self-care dimension. Men aged 35 plus reported fewer problems with pain/discomfort than women for both the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L. Health decreased with age as shown by the decrease from age group 18–24 to age group 75 plus in the indexes of both questionnaires: from 0.978 (SD = 0.048) to 0.774 (SD = 0.168) for EQ-5D-5L and from 0.981 (SD = 0.053) to 0.790 (0.164) for EQ-5D-3L. There was 29.6 points drop in the EQ-VAS score between the youngest and oldest group.
Conclusions
Population norms for the Romanian versions of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L, their indexes, and the EQ-VAS are now available. These can now be used as reference values by healthcare professionals, researchers and decision-makers leading to a further development of health-related quality of life research in Romania.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Center for drug evaluation and research. Clinical outcome assessment (COA) compendium https://www.fda.gov/media/130138/download. Accessed 22 September 2021.
2. PROMs data: can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? A narrative review;Field J;Patient Relat Outcome Meas,2019
3. Cella D, Hahn EA, Jensen SE, Butt Z, Nowinski CJ, Rothrock N, Lohr KN. Types of Patient-Reported Outcomes. In: Patient-Reported Outcomes in Performance Measurement. Research Triangle Park (NC); 2015.
4. Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science;McKenna SP;BMC Med,2011
5. Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon JA, Tsuchiya A, Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Saloman J, Tsuchiya A. Introduction to the measurement and valuation of health. In: Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation. Oxford University Press; 2016.