Barriers to Transanal Endoscopic Surgery Referral in Canada

Author:

Raskin Robert1,Neumann Katerina1,Jones Jennifer1

Affiliation:

1. Dalhousie University

Abstract

Abstract Backgroud: Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) is a minimally invasive procedure that allows for full thickness local excision of adenomas and select early rectal adenocarcinomas. Despite its advantages, TES is not uniformly utilized across Canada. Methods Potential barriers to TES referral were explored via a survey distributed to endoscopists across Canada, using a stratified sampling method. Results In total, 199/501 endoscopists completed our survey, including 62 (31%) gastroenterologists and 136 (69%) surgeons, consistent with a 39% response rate. For patients with clear and unclear indications for TES, 30/146 (27%) and 64/146 (44%) of referring endoscopists have a low referral rate, respectively. On univariable analysis, factors associated with low referral rate include lack of confidence with indications for TES [OR 9.9 (CI 3.15–31.4) p < 0.001], poor understanding regarding the advantages of TES [OR 11.3 (CI 3.83–33.1) p < 0.001], low comfort with referring [OR 183.7 (CI 21.9-1537.5) p < 0.001], distance greater than one hour from a TES surgeon [OR 5.786 (CI 2.63–12.8) p < 0.001] and lack of access to TES [OR 7.8 (CI 3.34-18.0) p < 0.001]. Gastroenterologists are more likely to have a low referral rate than surgeons [OR 2.76 (CI 1.30–5.8) p < 0.01]. On multivariable analysis, low comfort with referring [OR 67.4 (CI 5.8-779.8) p < 0.001] and greater distance to a TES surgeon [OR 4.5 (CI 1.17–16.9 p < 0.001)] remained independently associated with low referral rate. Provinces with a population of > 1 million [OR 3.66 (CI 1.49-9.0) p < 0.01], academic practice settings [OR 3.05 (CI 1.29–7.3) p < 0.05], and surgeon endoscopists [OR 4.5 (CI 1.68, 12.1) p < 0.01] were all independently associated with greater TES accessibility. Conclusions Many patients who are potentially eligible for TES are not being referred for consideration. An educational gap regarding indications, lack of comfort among referring physicians and geographic inaccessibility are among the greatest barriers to referral.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference31 articles.

1. Review: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM);Buess G;J R Coll Surg Edinb,1993

2. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer: T1 and beyond? An evidence-based review;Allaix ME;Surg Endosc,2016

3. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a review;Heidary B,2014

4. Surgical excision of retrorectal tumour using transanal endoscopic microsurgery;Serra Aracil X;Colorectal Dis,2010

5. The role of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumors;Suzuki H;J Nippon Med Sch,2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3