Young persons’ experiences of inpatient care when presenting with self-harm

Author:

Potgieter Francois,Martin Peter1

Affiliation:

1. University of Essex

Abstract

Abstract

In the UK, self-harm is a major healthcare problem. Self-harm is an especially common behaviour in young people admitted to psychiatric inpatient care and is one of the primary reasons for presenting to hospital. The management and treatment of self-harming behaviours can be challenging, and few treatment guidelines are available for inpatient settings. Poor understanding of self-harm and how to manage it effectively is likely to lead to staff feeling hopeless and helpless, but also to reduced support for the young people under their care. The current study constitutes an attempt to build on what is known by exploring young people’s reports on their experiences of inpatient treatment when presenting with self-harm. A grounded theory methodology was used to analyse the data. There were two key study aims which were: to obtain young people’s reports on their experiences of inpatient care when presenting with self-harm; and to integrate these views into a grounded theory that would serve as a model for understanding features of young persons’ experiences of inpatient care when presenting with self-harm. Semi-structured interviews were conducted at two NHS inpatient units supporting young people with mental health difficulties. Analysis of these interviews was done in accordance with grounded theory. Two core concepts of humanness and restriction emerged from the data which contribute to the construction of meaning and understanding. Service implications and recommendations highlight the need for improved understanding, maintaining relationships and continued connection during admissions. The methodology contributed to developing a rich and detailed understanding of young persons’ experiences of inpatient care when presenting with self-harm.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference60 articles.

1. Child and adolescent inpatient mental health services: A research review;Arnold EM;Child Adolesc Soc Work J,1995

2. Bell J, Nutt L. Divided loyalties, divided knowledge: Ethical and practical dilemmas of fieldwork in conflict settings. Zed Books; 2002.

3. British Psychological Society. (2014). Code of Human Research Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.bps.org.uk/news-and-policy/bps-code-human-research-ethics-2nd- edition-2014.

4. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage; 2006.

5. Chaplin R, Thorp G, Repper J. Social inclusion and mental health. Rethink; 2009.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3