Affiliation:
1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2. Babol University of Medical Sciences
3. Bogomolets National Medical University
4. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
5. Shantou University Medical College
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Given the limited specificity of D-dimer, there is a perceived need to discover a more precise marker for diagnosing individuals who are suspected of having pulmonary embolism (PE). In this study, by Evaluating the increase in the serum level of Apelin-13 and D-dimer, we found valuable findings about Apelin-13, which can be suggested as an auxiliary and non-invasive diagnostic biomarker in individuals with suspected PE, based on the obtained results.
Methods: In this case-control study, 52 Iranian individuals with a suspicion of pulmonary embolism, were included and then were separated into two groups based on CT angiography results serving as the gold standard imaging method for diagnosing PE: patients with and without PE. Finally, the serum levels of these markers were compared in these two groups.
Results: The mean serum D-dimer levels in patients with PE were significantly elevated (p<0.001) in comparison to those without PE (1102.47 to 456.2 ng/ml). Furthermore, the mean level of Apelin-13 was significantly higher in patients with PE (49.8 to 73.11 ng/L) (p <0.001). The cutoff point of Apelin-13 has been calculated 58.50 ng/ml, with 90.9% sensitivity and 90% specificity. The D-dimer cutoff point was 500 ng/ml, with 95.5% sensitivity and 43.3% specificity.
Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, the serum level of Apelin-13 can be used as novel diagnostic and screening biomarker in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism
Keywords: Pulmonary embolism, Thromboembolism, Apelin-13, D-dimer.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism;Kearon C;Cmaj,2003
2. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism;Konstantinides SV;Eur Heart J,2014
3. Pulmonary embolism, part I: Epidemiology, risk factors and risk stratification, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism;Bĕlohlávek J;Exp Clin Cardiol,2013
4. Incidence and prevalence of venous thromboembolism in Norway 2010–2017;Ghanima W;Thrombosis Research,2020
5. Incidence, mortality and bleeding rates associated with pulmonary embolism in England between 1997 and 2015;Kempny A;International journal of cardiology,2019