Understanding Antibiotic Purchasing Practices in Community Pharmacies in Bangladesh: A Potential Driver of Emerging Antimicrobial Resistance

Author:

Masud Abdullah1,Walpola Ramesh Lahiru1,Sarker Malabika2,Kabir Alamgir3,Asaduzzaman Muhammad4,Islam Md Saiful1,Mostafa Ayesha Tasnim5,Akhtar Zubair1,Barua Mrittika5,Seale Holly1

Affiliation:

1. University of New South Wales

2. Heidelberg University

3. The George Institute for Global Health

4. University of Oslo

5. BRAC James P. Grant School of Public Health

Abstract

Abstract

Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses significant health threats for low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) and 80% of antibiotics are used in the community, with 20–50% inappropriate use. Southeast Asia, including Bangladesh, faces higher AMR risk due to suboptimal healthcare standards and over-the-counter antibiotic usage. Methods This cross-sectional survey included 365 antibiotic customers from pharmacies, alongside structured observation of over 1,000 medicine dispensing events across four urban and rural areas in Bangladesh, aiming to understand antibiotic dispensing patterns in community pharmacies and identify factors influencing purchasing behaviors contributing to irrational usage. Hospital-adjacent areas were excluded to minimize potential biases of formal healthcare medication patterns. Descriptive analyses characterized antibiotic use, while Poisson regression assessed the influence of patients' demographic factors and health conditions on their prescription behavior. Results Out of 1,000 observed medicine dispensing events, 25.9% were antibiotics. In the survey, 56.6% customers purchased antibiotics without a prescription from drug-sellers and informal healthcare providers, mainly for “acute and non-severe” conditions like upper respiratory-tract infections (37.4%), fever (31.7%), and uncomplicated skin infections (20%), gastrointestinal-infections (11.2%), urinary-tract infections (10.1%). Commonly purchased antibiotics included macrolides (21.8%), third-generation cephalosporins (20.8%), second-generation cephalosporins (16.9%). Following WHO-AWeRe classifications, 73.5% antibiotics fell into the Watch, 23.1% in the Access category, and 8.8% were not-recommended beta-lactamase inhibitors. The likelihood of presenting a prescription while purchasing antibiotics was 27% lower for individuals aged 6–59 compared to those ≤ 5 or ≥ 60. Lower respiratory-tract infections and enteric fever exhibited a greater influence with higher prescription rates than other health conditions, with adjusted prevalence ratios were respectively 1.78 (95% CI: 1.04, 3.03) and 1.87 (95% CI: 1.07, 3.29). Other demographic factors, including sex, urban-rural locations, income, education, and number of health-symptoms, showed no statistically significant influences on prescription likelihood after adjusting for confounders. Conclusions This study underscores widespread broad-spectrum antibiotic sales without prescriptions, emphasizing the need for tailored interventions considering prevailing health-seeking practices in diverse informal healthcare settings in LMICs. Imposing prescription-only rules faces challenges due to easy access through community pharmacies and potential conflicts of interest. Formulating feasible interventions requires user-centric approaches involving co-designed research with stakeholders, alongside prioritizing mass awareness and monitoring over-the-counter antibiotic sales.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference60 articles.

1. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis;Murray CJ;Lancet,2022

2. Antimicrobial resistance in low-and middle-income countries: current status and future directions;Sulis G;Expert Rev anti-infective therapy,2022

3. Klein EY et al. Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018. 115(15): pp. E3463-E3470.

4. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial resistance global report on surveillance: 2014 summary. World Health Organization; 2014.

5. Household antimicrobial self-medication: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the burden, risk factors and outcomes in developing countries;Ocan M;BMC Public Health,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3