Metabolic and Immune Consequences of Antibiotic Related Microbiome Alterations during first-line Tuberculosis Treatment in Bamako, Mali
Author:
Diallo Dramane1, Sun Shan2, Somboro Anou Moise3, Baya Bocar1, Kone Amadou1, Diarra Bassirou1, Nantoume Mohamed1, Koloma Isaac1, Diakite Mahamadou1, Holl Jane4, Maiga Almoustapha Issiaka1, Seydi Moussa5, Theron Grant6, Hou Lifang7, Fodor Anthony2, Maiga Mamoudou7
Affiliation:
1. University Clinical Research Center (UCRC) of the University of Sciences, Technics and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB) 2. Department of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, North Carolina 3. School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa 4. Department of Neurology and Center for Healthcare Delivery Science and Innovation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 5. Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Fann University Hospital Center, Dakar 6. Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research; South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, Saint Kitts and Nevis 7. Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Tuberculosis (TB) infection is known to lead to the unbalance of the gut microbiota and act synergistically on the decline of the host immune response, when untreated. Moreover, previous work has found a correlation between dysbiosis in the gut microbiota composition and the use of antibiotics. However, there is a need for an in-depth understanding of the metabolic and immune consequences of antibiotic-related microbiome alterations during first-line TB treatment.
Methods
In a longitudinal cohort study, which included TB-infected cohorts and healthy individuals (control group), we studied the anti-TB-related changes in the gut microbiota composition and related functional consequences. Sputum, whole blood and stool samples were collected from participants at four time-points including before (Month-0), during (Month-2), at the end of drug treatment (Month-6) and 9 months after treatment (Month-15). Controls were sampled at inclusion and Month-6. We analyzed the microbiota composition and microbial functional pathways with shotgun metagenomics, analyzed the blood metabolomics using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and measured the levels of metabolites and cytokines with cytometric bead array.
Results
We found that the gut microbiota of patients infected with TB was different from that of the healthy controls. The gut microbiota became similar to healthy controls after treatment but was still significantly different after 6 months treatment and at the follow up 9 months after treatment. Our data also showed disturbance in the plasma metabolites such as tryptophan and tricarboxylic acids components of patients during TB treatment. Levels of IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-γ decreased during treatment and levels were maintained after treatment completion, while IL-17A known to have a strong link with the gut microbiota was highly expressed during treatment period and longer than the 9-month post treatment completion. We found that some fatty acids were negatively correlated with the abundance of taxa. For example, Roseburia, Megasphaera, and alpha proteobacterium HIMB5 species were negatively correlated (rho = -0.6) with the quinolinate production.
Conclusion
Changes in the composition and function of gut microbiota was observed in TB patients before and after treatment compared to healthy controls. The differences persisted at nine months after treatment completion. Alterations in some bacterial taxa were correlated to the changes in metabolite levels in peripheral blood, thus the altered microbial community might lead to changes in immune status that influence the disease outcome and future resistance to infections.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. WHO. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Tuberculosis Report [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Apr 18]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tuberculosis 2. de Martino M, Lodi L, Galli L, Chiappini E. Immune Response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A Narrative Review. Front Pediatr [Internet]. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2019 [cited 2021 Sep 6];7:350. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6718705/ 3. Aravindan P. Host genetics and tuberculosis: Theory of genetic polymorphism and tuberculosis. Lung India [Internet]. Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications; 2019 [cited 2021 Sep 6];36:244–52. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6503728/ 4. Nahid P, Dorman SE, Alipanah N, Barry PM, Brozek JL, Cattamanchi A, et al. Official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control andPrevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines: Treatmentof Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis An Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2016 [cited 2022 Aug 30];63:e147. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6590850/ 5. Namasivayam S, Maiga M, Yuan W, Thovarai V, Costa DL, Mittereder LR, et al. Longitudinal profiling reveals a persistent intestinal dysbiosis triggered by conventional anti-tuberculosis therapy. Microbiome [Internet]. BioMed Central; 2017 [cited 2020 Jun 19];5:71. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5501520/
|
|