A comparative national-level analysis of government food system resilience activities in preparation for future food system disruptions.

Author:

Lloyd Jane1,Moore E.R.H.1,Dowell Lyndsey2,Neff Roni3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

2. The Nature Conservancy

3. Center for a Livable Future & Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic, extreme weather events, and the Russian invasion of Ukraine have highlighted global food system vulnerabilities and a lack of preparedness and prospective planning for increasingly complex disruptions. This has spurred an interest in food system resilience. Despite the elevated interest in food system resilience, there is a lack of comparative analyses of national-level food system resilience efforts. An improved understanding of the food system resilience landscape can support and inform future policies, programs, and planning. Methods We conducted a cross-country comparison of national-level food system resilience activities from Australia, Aotearoa (New Zealand), Sweden, and the United States. We developed upon and adapted the resilience framework proposed by Harris and Spiegel to compare actions derived from thirteen national food system resilience documents. We coded the documents based on how the governments determined actions by food system resilience attribute utilized, part of the food supply chain, specific shocks or stressors, implementation level, the temporal focus of action, and the expected impact on food security. We analyzed and compared countries’ coded categories, subcategories, and category combinations. Results The results showed that countries are using multi-pronged policy actions to address food system resilience issues and are focused on both retrospective reviews and prospective models of disruptive events to inform their decisions. Some work has been done towards preparing for climate change and other natural disasters, but not as much for other shocks or stressors. Conclusions The analysis identified potential gaps, concentrations, and themes in national food systems resilience. The framework can be applied to augment existing policy, create new policy, as well as to supplement and complement other existing frameworks.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference34 articles.

1. A systems approach to navigating food security during COVID-19: Gaps, opportunities, and policy supports;Glaros A;Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development,2021

2. Big data, information asymmetry, and food supply chain management for resilience;Miller M;Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development,2021

3. Exploring global food system shocks, scenarios and outcomes;Hamilton H;Futures,2020

4. United Nations. Act now to end food, energy and finance crisis, Guterres urges world leaders. UN News; 8 Jun 2022. Available from: https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/06/1119962

5. World Health Organization. The top 10 causes of death. WHO Newsroom Fact sheets, 9 Dec 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3