Ovarian Cancer Management in an ESGO Ovarian Cancer Center of Excellence: A systematic case study of the interprofessional and interdisciplinary interaction

Abstract

Abstract Purpose. With growing knowledge about ovarian cancer over the last decades diagnosis, evaluation and treatment in ovarian cancer patients has become highly specialized, and an individually adapted approach should be made in each woman by interdisciplinary cooperation. The present study aims to show the variety and extent of medical specialties involved at our institution according to the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO) Quality indicators (QI). Methods. A woman, diagnosed with a high-grade ovarian cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IIIb was selected for a single case observational study. The observation period (total = 22d) comprised preoperative diagnostic procedures, including imaging, the in-patient stay for cytoreductive surgery, and the postoperative course and case discussion at our interdisciplinary tumor board. Data were obtained by self-reporting and by patient file review. Results. Patient-tracking demonstrated an interdisciplinary cooperation of 12 medical specialties (62 physicians [63% male, 37% female]) 8 different types of nursing staff (n = 59 [22% male, 78% female]) and 9 different types of peri-operative/administrative staff (n = 23; male 17,4%, female n = 19, 82,6%]). Contact with the patient was direct (n = 199; 76%) or without face-to-face interaction (n = 63; 24%). Conclusion. The present study demonstrates the high diversity of physicians and the affiliated medical staff as well as interdisciplinary intersections within teams of specialized hospitals. according to the ESGO QIs. This report underlines the requirement of an adequate infrastructure for the complex management of advanced ovarian cancer patients. Future prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the specific procedures and actions to optimize the interprofessional and interdisciplinary workflows.