Affiliation:
1. University of Nevada Las Vegas School of Nursing
2. University of Nevada Las Vegas School of Public Health
3. University of Nevada Las Vegas Department of Economics Lee Business School
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Lack of a validated assessment of maternal risk-appropriate care for use in population data has prevented the existing literature from quantifying the benefit of maternal risk-appropriate care. The objective of this study was to develop a measure of hospital maternal levels of care based on the resources available at the hospital, using existing data available to researchers.
Methods
This was a Secondary Data Analysis. The sample was abstracted from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database for 2018. Eligibility was limited to short-term acute general hospitals that reported providing maternity services as measured by hospital reporting of an obstetric service level, obstetric services, or birthing rooms. A method to identify maternal level of care was created by identifying variables in the dataset that aligned with the ACOG criteria for each maternal level. The validity of the method was measured as the level of agreement of the distribution of hospital levels with the distribution in CDC Levels of Care Assessment Tool Validation Pilot. Results were compared to hospital self-report in the database and measurement reported with another published method.
Results
The sample included 2,351 hospitals. AHA variables were available to measure resources that align with ACOG Levels 1, 2, and 3. Overall, 1219 (51.9%) of hospitals reported resources aligned with Maternal Level One, 816 (34.7%) aligned with maternal level two, and 202 (8.6%) aligned with maternal level Three. This method overestimates the prevalence of hospitals with maternal level one compared to the CDC measurement of 36.1% (Mean 52.9%; 95% CI47.2% − 58.7%), and likely includes hospitals that would not qualify as level one if all resources required by the ACOG guidelines could be assessed. This method underestimates the prevalence of hospitals with maternal critical care services (Level 3 or 4) compared to CDC measure of 12.1% (Mean 8.1%; 95%CI 6.2% – 10.0%) but is an improvement over hospital self-report (24.7%) and a prior published method (32.3%).
Conclusions
This method of measuring maternal level of care allows researchers to investigate the value of perinatal regionalization, risk-appropriate care, and hospital differences among the three levels of care.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC