Dose Escalation in Radical Radio(chemo)therapy for Cervical and Upper Thoracic Esophageal Cancer with 3DCRT/IMRT (ChC&UES): A Multi-center Real world Study

Author:

Zhao Xiao-Han1,Zhang Wen-Cheng2,Wang Xin3,Chen Jun-Qiang4,Xu Yuan-Ji4,Zhao Kuai-Le5,Huang Wei6,Qian Pu-Dong7,Liu Ya-Tian7,Ge Xiao-Lin8,Xia Xiao-Jie8,Weng Chen-Gang1,Gai Chun-Yue1,Wang He-Song1,Gao Hong-Mei9,Shen Wen-Bin1,Zhu Shu-Chai1

Affiliation:

1. the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University

2. Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer

3. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College

4. Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital

5. Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center

6. Shandong Tumor Hospital

7. Jiangsu Cancer Hospital

8. Jiangsu Province Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital

9. Shijiazhuang People’s Hospital

Abstract

Abstract

Background Cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer (ESCA) presents treatment challenges due to limited clinical evidence. This multi-center study (ChC&UES) explores radical radio(chemo)therapy efficacy and safety, especially focusing on radiation dose. Method We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 1,422 cases across 8 medical centers. According to the radiation dose for primary gross tumor, patients were divided into standard dose radiotherapy (SD, 50-55 Gy) or high dose (HD, >55 Gy) radiotherapy. HD was further subdivided into conventional- high-dose group (HD-conventional, 55Gy-63Gy) and ultra-high-dose group (HD-ultra, ≥63Gy). Primary outcome was Overall Survival (OS). Results The median OS was 33.0 months (95% CI: 29.401-36.521) in the whole cohort. Compared with SD, HD shown significant improved survival in cervical ESCA in Kaplan-Meier (P=0.026) and cox multivariate regression analysis (P=0.018) while shown comparable survival in upper thoracic ESCA (P=0.734). No significant difference existed between HD-conventional and HD-ultra in cervical (P=0.976) and upper thoracic (P=0.610) ESCA. Incidences of radiation esophagitis and pneumonia from HD were comparable to SD (P=0.097, 0.240), while myosuppression risk was higher(P=0.039). The Bonferroni method revealed that, for both cervical and upper thoracic ESCA, HD-ultra enhance the objective response rate (ORR) compared to SD (P< 0.05). Combination of chemotherapy was an dependent prognosis factor of OS (P=0.000,0.039), no survival advantage was found with different chemotherapy regimens or prolonged chemotherapy >4 cycles (All P>0.05). Conclusion: HD radiotherapy benefits cervical but not upper thoracic ESCA, while increasing bone marrow suppression risk. Further dose escalating (≥ 63Gy) doesn't improve survival but enhances ORR.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3