Abstract
Relationships between the leader and the follower are crucial in meeting organizational objectives. The efforts of both the leader and the follower are of paramount importance. However, heavy responsibility is placed on the leader for organizational success and follower mobilization. Interpersonal relationships are the vehicle through which it becomes possible for follower functionality to test its best form. Follower functionality refers to the ability of followers to discharge their duties. It has been established that the sociability trait, through the Leader-Member Exchange Theory (LMX) framework, enhances the social capital necessary for the delivery of organizational objectives. Such an environment tills the workspace for follower expression and functionality. While sociability is mainly hereditary, leaders can foster it by developing basic disciplines and exercises like intentionally connecting with followers, walking around, promoting teamwork and utilizing humor. The leader’s sociability may increase motivation and creativity levels, productivity, freedom of expression and reduce stress for the followers. Leader sociability is presented as one of the ways to improve follower functionality.
Publisher
Adventist University of Africa
Reference72 articles.
1. Avolio, B. J., Howell, J. M., & Sosik, J. J. (1999). A funny thing happened on the way to the bottom line: Humor as a moderator of leadership style effects. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 219-227.
2. Beheshtifar M, Rashidi M, NekoieMoghadam M. (2011). Study of organizational socialization and its relationship on employees’ performance. African Journal of Business Management, 5, 1054010544.
3. Bennis, W. (2007). The challenges of leadership in the modern world: Introduction to the special issue. American Psychologist, 62(1), 2-5.
4. Brandon, J. (2013). Personality doesn’t determine leadership ability. https://www.inc.com/john-brandon/introvert-extrovert-personality-type-leadership.html. Accessed 09 April 2021
5. Brzky, A.S. (2010). Relationship between organizational socialization and organizational commitment in Kurdistan gas company. Change Management, 3, 11.