Abstract
As a subtype of toponym, hydronyms reflect people’s perception, understanding, and contemplation of waterbodies. With data collected from authoritative gazetteers, this study classifies the names of 189 major rivers distributed across Mainland China into seven categories to extrapolate general rules governing river-naming in China. The results show that descriptive names comprise the biggest share. Based on this study’s research findings, this article also discusses the complex cognitive processes, including conceptual metonymy, conceptual metaphor, and conceptual blending involved in river-naming in China. Specifically, based on the principles of proximity and prominence, the most frequently employed types were the following metonymies: PLACE FOR RIVER, PROPERTY FOR RIVER, PERSON FOR RIVER, EVENT FOR RIVER, and FUNCTION FOR RIVER. As this research shows, river naming in China is not arbitrary, but highly motivated.
Publisher
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Demography
Reference32 articles.
1. Algeo, John and Katie Algeo. 2000. “Onomastics as an Interdisciplinary Study.” Names 48, no. 3/4: 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1179/nam.2000.48.3-4.265
2. Blažek, Vaclav. 1999. “Toward the Indo-European Etymology of the Finnish Hydronym aura(-joki).” Indogermanische Forschungen 104, no. 1999: 89-94.
3. The Board on Hebei Geographic Names. 1984. Hebei Sheng Di Ming Zhi [Hebei Gazetteer]. Shi Jia Zhuang: Place Names Office of Hebei Province.
4. The Board on Inner Mongolia Geographic Names. 1990. Neimenggu Zi Zhi Qu Di Ming Zhi [Gazetteer of Inner Mongolis Autonomous Region]. Tongliao: The Board on Inner Mongolia Geogrpahic Names.
5. The Committee of Local Records of Guangdong Province. 1999. Guangdong Sheng Zhi Di Ming Zhi [Guangdong Local Records: Guangdong Gazetteer]. Guangzhou: Guangdong People’s Publishing House.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献