Use of a Telerehabilitation Platform in a Stroke Continuum: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Therapist Acceptability
-
Published:2022-12-13
Issue:2
Volume:14
Page:
-
ISSN:1945-2020
-
Container-title:International Journal of Telerehabilitation
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Int J Telerehab
Author:
Gaboury Isabelle,Dostie Rosalie,Corriveau Hélène,Demoustier Arnaud,Tousignant Michel
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe the acceptability of a stroke telerehabilitation platform from the perspective of both patients and therapists. Two public rehabilitation centers participated in a pilot telerehabilitation trial. A theoretical framework was used to conceptualize acceptability. Semi-structured individual interviews with patients and focus groups of therapists were conducted. Most participants and therapists were satisfied with the intervention. Participants emphasized the advantages of staying at home to get their treatments. Therapists were more skeptical at first about their self-efficacy to deliver therapy remotely. There was a consensus among therapists about the need for a combination of telerehabilitation and in-person visits to optimize treatments. While we found overall good acceptability, effectiveness of this technology could be improved via an accessible user interface, complementary rehabilitation material, and ongoing training and technical just-in-time support with therapists.
Funder
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Publisher
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
Subject
Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Computer Science Applications,Rehabilitation
Reference56 articles.
1. Anderson, C., Mhurchu, C. N., Rubenach, S., Clark, M., Spencer, C., & Winsor, A. (2000). Home or hospital for stroke rehabilitation? Results of a randomized controlled trial : II: Cost minimization analysis at 6 months. Stroke, 31(5), 1032-1037. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.31.5.1032 2. Beck, AT, Rial, WY, Rickels K. (1974). Short Form of Depression Inventory: Cross-validation. Psychological Reports, 34(3_suppl), 1184-1186. https://doi.org/10.1177/003329417403403s01 3. Beit Yosef, A., Jacobs, J. M., Shenkar, S., Shames, J., Schwartz, I., Doryon, Y., Naveh, Y., Khalailh, F., Berrous, S., & Gilboa, Y. (2019). Activity performance, participation, and quality of life among adults in the chronic stage after acquired brain injury-the feasibility of an occupation-based telerehabilitation intervention. Frontiers in Neurology, 10, 1247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01247 4. Benvenuti, F., Stuart, M., Cappena, V., Gabella, S., Corsi, S., Taviani, A., Albino, A., Scattareggia Marchese, S., & Weinrich, M. (2014). Community-based exercise for upper limb paresis: A controlled trial with telerehabilitation. Neurorehabilation and Neural Repair, 28(7), 611-620. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314521003 5. Bienassis, K. d., Llena-Nozal, A., & Klazinga, N. S. (2020). The economics of patient safety Part III: Long-term care: Valuing safety for the long haul, OECD Health Working Papers, No. 121, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/be07475c-en.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|