Abstract
The pain-assessment literature often claims that pain is subjective. However, the meaning and implications of this claim are left to the reader’s imagination. This paper attempts to make sense of the claim and its problems from the history and philosophy of science perspective. It examines the work of Henry Beecher, the first person to operationalize “pain” in terms of subjective measurements. First, I reconstruct Beecher’s operationalization of “pain.” Next, I argue this operationalization fails. Third, I salvage Beecher’s insights by repositioning them in an intersubjective account. Finally, I connect these insights to current pain-assessment approaches, showing that they enrich each other.
Publisher
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
Reference68 articles.
1. Abdelhady, Ahmed, Rawan Alshahrani , Rawabi Asaheimi, Amani Alamrani, Mohammed Alqahtani, Abdulelah Asiri, Yousef Alharthi, et al. 2021. “Review: Clinical Pain Assessment Scoring Systems and Practice Essentials in Acute and Chronic Pain. Journal of Healthcare Sciences 1, no. 3: 50–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.52533/JOHS.2021.1107.
2. Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam and Modernity. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
3. Ayer, Alfred Jules. 1952. Language, Truth, and Logic. New York: Dover Publications.
4. Bain, David. 2017. “Evaluativist Accounts of Pain’s Unpleasantness.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Pain, edited by Jennifer Corns, 40–49. New York: Routledge.
5. Ball, C. and R.N. Westhorpe. 2011. “The History of Pain Measurement.: Anesthesia and Intensive Care 39, no. 4: 529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x1103900401.