Part One of the Themed Issue on Reimagining Research Methods Coursework for the Preparation of Scholar-Practitioners-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Part One of the Themed Issue on Reimagining Research Methods Coursework for the Preparation of Scholar-Practitioners

Published:2023-04-24 Issue:2 Volume:8 Page:1-3
ISSN:2472-5889
Container-title:Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice
language:
Short-container-title:IE

Author:

Capello Sarah^ORCID,Yurkofsky Maxwell^ORCID,Nii Bonney Edwin^ORCID

Abstract

Ongoing efforts to distinguish the EdD from the PhD as a professional practice doctorate have important implications for how research methodology courses are designed, sequenced, and taught in CPED-inspired EdD programs. Currently, there is much debate and little consensus as to what the purpose and outcomes of these courses should be and how the courses might differ from traditional doctoral-level methods preparation. In this first installment of the themed issue on redesigning research methods for CPED-inspired EdD programs, EdD faculty and students share their current redesign work and experiences implementing revised methodology courses as part of larger, practitioner-oriented program revisions.

Publisher

University Library System, University of Pittsburgh

Subject

Ocean Engineering,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Reference20 articles.

1. Allen, J., Chirichello, M., & Wasicsko, M. (2016). The practitioner-scholar doctorate: Not a PhD lite. In J. A. Perry (Ed.), The EdD and the scholarly practitioner: The CPED path (pp. 105-130). Information Age Publishing.

2. Barnett, B. G., & Muth, R. (2008). Using action-research strategies and cohort structures to ensure research competence for practitioner-scholar leaders. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 3(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277510800300101

3. Bengston, E., Lasater, K., Murphy-Lee, M. M., & Jones, S. J. (2016). The role of research courses. In J. A. Perry (Ed.), The EdD and the scholarly practitioner: The CPED path (pp. 79-104). Information Age Publishing.

4. Buss, R. R., & Zambo, D. (2016). Using action research to develop educational leaders and researchers. In J. A. Perry (Ed.), The EdD and the scholarly practitioner: The CPED path (pp. 137-152). Information Age Publishing.

5. Capello, S. A., Bonney, E. N., & Yurkofsky, M. (in press). The practitioner inquiry course sequence: Centering improvement science in the design of an EdD program. In C. Benedetti & A. Covarrubias (Eds.), Critical inquiry and applied research in Ed.D. programs: Moving beyond traditional methods. Myers Education Press.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. EdD Students’ Sensemaking of Improvement Science as a Tool for Change in Education;Journal of Research on Leadership Education;2024-01-04

2. Part Two of the Themed Issue on Reimagining Research Methods Coursework for the Preparation of Scholar-Practitioners;Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice;2023-09-05