Abstract
This essay shares the ongoing efforts of faculty in one EdD program to embrace applied research methodologies and the shifts made in research coursework to support our doctoral candidates as they explore problems of practice. Framed by third space theory, our redesign work is positioned as the lived experience through which we were able to reflect on and change the traditional space of our advanced qualitative and quantitative method courses. We share our journey from conceptualization to teaching what began, but did not conclude, as two distinct courses including the challenges, successes, and subsequent strategies used in our teaching and development. We reflect on the tensions that arose from our preexisting beliefs about research and the needs articulated by our candidates as well as our navigation of those needs.
Publisher
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
Subject
Ocean Engineering,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Reference11 articles.
1. Adams, A., E. Bondy, D. Ross, N. Dana, & B. L. Kennedy-Lewis. (2014). Implementing an online professional practice doctoral program in a PhD environment: Managing the dilemmas. Journal of School Public Relations, 35(3), 363–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jspr.35.3.363
2. Carnegie Project for the Education Doctorate (2019). Our vision and mission. https://www.cpedinitiative.org/vision-mission
3. Flessner, R. (2014). Revisiting reflection: Utilizing third spaces in teacher education. The Educational Forum, 78(3), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2014.912711
4. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study application. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
5. Perry, J. A., & Imig, D. G. (2010). A stewardship of practice in education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40(6), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.40.6.42-49
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献