The Group-Based Dissertation in Practice: A Journey Worth Taking

Author:

Hamilton WilliamORCID

Abstract

This personal reflective essay explores a group Dissertation in Practice (DiP) model and process used in a localized Doctor of Education program. It describes and recommends this team-based DiP approach as an innovation that prepares practitioners to tackle complex problems of practice by focusing on a process centered around group dynamics that requires collaboration, advanced dialectical activity, engagement of stakeholders, and application of solutions to localized problems of practice. The framework of the exploration is based on accepted theories of small group development. Implications of this DiP approach include providing doctoral students collaborative problem-solving skills and professional capacity building. Ultimately, the model enables doctoral students, as future educators and leaders, to transform an environment predicated on teaching and learning in isolation to one of a highly functioning, effective team-based professional practice.

Publisher

University Library System, University of Pittsburgh

Subject

Ocean Engineering,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Reference11 articles.

1. Augusta University College of Education [AUCOE]. (2021). Doctorate of education (Ed.D.) in educational innovation. Augusta University College of Education. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from https://www.augusta.edu/education/advanced-studies-innovation/edd-ei.php

2. CPED (2021). #CPED20 annual and virtual convening. CPED. Retrieved August 3, 2021 from https://www.cpedinitiative.org/index.php?option=com_jevents&task=icalrepeat.detail&evid=3&Itemid=115&year=2020&month=10&day=14&title=cped20-october-convening&uid=d96bc54a8d2271576fc684660d507adc

3. CPED (2021A). The CPED framework. CPED. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from https://www.cpedinitiative.org/the-framework

4. Guttenberg, J. (2020). Group development model and Lean Six Sigma project team outcomes. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 11(4), 635-661. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-09-2018-0101

5. Kennedy, B., Altman, M., & Pizano, A. (2018). Engaging in the battle of the snails by challenging the traditional dissertation model. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2018.27

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3