Abstract
This essay describes the development and implementation of the redesigned Doctor of Education program at Northeastern University. In our new model, students implement and evaluate the effectiveness of their change work while enrolled in our program. Our intent in moving from a traditional model to our alternative model was to focus on providing students the opportunity to create systemic, justice-oriented change guided by our faculty. The program now uses action research as its signature pedagogy and an alternative format for the Dissertation in Practice. We developed the alternative format for the Dissertation in Practice to privilege participants’ voices and to focus on the results of our students’ initiatives. This essay discusses the challenges and successes experienced in the creation and implementation of an alternative model for the Doctor of Education degree.
Publisher
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
Subject
Ocean Engineering,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Reference9 articles.
1. Coghlan, D. (2011). Action research: Exploring perspectives on a philosophy of practical knowing. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 53-87. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.571520
2. Denecke, D., & McCarthy, M. T. (2017). Articulating learning outcomes in doctoral education. Council of Graduate Schools.
3. Harden, R. M. (1999). What is a spiral curriculum?.Medical teacher, 21(2), 141-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421599979752
4. Herr, K. & Anderson, G. (2015). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty (2nd ed.). Sage Publishing.
5. Horton, M., & Freire, P. (1990). We make the road by walking: Conversations on education and social change. Temple University Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献