Affiliation:
1. Institute for Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade
Abstract
Charlene Haddock Seigfried argues that William James?s philosophy
significantly influenced the shaping of pragmatist feminism and feminist
pragmatism. Interpreting his works, she recognized the potential of his
ideas for feminist reconstruction and their alignment with feminist goals.
However, Seigfried also criticizes James for what she perceives as pervasive
sexism in his writings. In this paper, I will defend James from the
accusations made by Seigfried and demonstrate that he did not hold such a
hostile attitude towards women as she suggests.
Funder
Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Reference30 articles.
1. Barzun, Jacques (1983). A Stroll with William James (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).
2. Butler, Leslie (2014). “Encountering the Smashing Projectile: William James on John Stuart Mill and the Woman Question”, in Martin Halliwell and Joel D. S. Rasmussen (eds.), William James and the Transatlantic Conversation: Pragmatism, Pluralism, and Philosophy of Religion (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 115-130.
3. Cox, Brian (2019). “William James and Functionalism”, in The History and Evolution of Psychology: A Philosophical and Biological Perspective (New York: Routledge): 209-263.
4. DuBois, W. E. B. (1960). “A Negro Student at Harvard at the End of the 19th Century”. The Massachusetts Review 1(3): 439-458.
5. Garrison, George R. and Madden Edward H. (1977). “William James - Warts and All”, American Quarterly 29(2): 207-221.