Affiliation:
1. Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Univerzitet u Beogradu
Abstract
The paper focuses on emotional subjectivity (a sense of own identity based on
an emotional reception of values) on the one hand, and the constitution of
an organic community (one characterized by immediacy, as opposed to a formal
community, which is permeated by institutional relations that mediate
intersubjective relations between the community?s members). The argument
rests on the idea, supported by modern experimental neuroscience, that
emotions are the key dynamic factors of decision-making, quite contrary to
the asumption of a rational deliberation. This idea generates significant
consequences for the understanding of virtue, individual and collective
identity, and the way in which informal communities are formed, even within
larger institutionalized societies. One of the implications of the idea that
emotional subjectivity is at the core of decision-making is that any
therapeutic intervention, including philotherapy, must take as its starting
assumption the fundamental emotional foundations of all decisions and
actions taken in society. When this therapeutic approach is applied to
issues that reach beyond the individual concerns or interests, it becomes
activist, and takes on the shape of social engagement. The paper argues that
the emotionality of intersubjective dynamism in society necessitates a
social role for philosophical practice, both as a therapeutic activity (in
the form of individual or group socialization or resocialization with regard
to values), and as a shaping influence on social discourse on values,
specifically focusing on developing a particular collective sensibility for
key values that contribute to ideas such as the good life, a cohesive
community or common fate, all of which characterize organicism in
community-building that has proven as a form of social healing in cases of
collective distress.
Publisher
National Library of Serbia