Affiliation:
1. Institut za filozofiju, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu
Abstract
The main goal of this paper is to analyze the (pseudo)scientific status of
psychoanalysis and identifying methodological problems of testing
psychoanalytic hypotheses. After considering the scientific and hermeneutic
reception of psychoanalysis, we see the future of psychoanalysis in
methodological pluralism as a research method that bridges the gap between
the two mentioned traditions.
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Reference42 articles.
1. Bornstein, R. F. (2001). The impending death of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology. 18: 3-20.
2. Bunge, M. (2012). Evaluating Philosophies. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 295. New York: Springer-Verlag.
3. Canceil, O. et al. (2004). Psychotherapy: Three approaches evaluated. INSERM Collective Expert Reports.
4. Cioffi, F. (1970). Freud and the idea of a pseudoscience. In Explanation in the Behavioural Sciences, (eds) R.R. Borger & F. Cioffi. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 508-515.
5. Cioffi, F. (1998). Freud and the question of pseudoscience. Chicago: Open Court.