Contemporary journalism: Profession or a “bullshit job”

Author:

Popovic Helena1ORCID,Hromadzic Hajrudin2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Filozofski fakultet, Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Hrvatska

2. Filozofski fakultet, Sveučilište u Rijeci, Hrvatska

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to rethink the position of the journalistic profession in the contemporary social contexts of the 21st century, within the context of social changes determined by capitalism in its radical stage, and the permanent transformations of digital technologies as the main tool for production and consumption. The central question that arises is whether we can still think of journalism as a profession in accordance with the principles formed in the midtwentieth century, or whether the journalistic profession is ?dead?, transformed into a ?bullshit job?? If we look at the three main indicators of professional journalism: public interest and the watchdog function; autonomy; and the adherence to specific professional norms; it seems, by looking at actual journalistic practices, that all three indicators that fundamentally legitimize journalism as a profession has eroded significantly. The main claim is that journalism, to a large extent, has turned into a ?bullshit job?, even if the ?old? normative principles of the profession still serves to legitimize it, but with no stronghold in real journalist practices. Of course, this does not mean that professional journalism, defined according to the principles established in mid-twentieth century, is not still relevant, even crucial for the public and public interest. This is why, in the conclusion of the paper, we plead for the strengthening of those media organizations that nurture the protection of the public interest as well as investigative and critically oriented, independent journalism.

Publisher

National Library of Serbia

Reference59 articles.

1. Al theide, D. L. and Snow, R. P. (1991). Media Worlds in the Postjournalism Era. New York: Walter de Gruyter Inc.

2. Bagdikian, B. H. (2004). The New Media Monopoly. Boston: Beacon Press.

3. Baran, S. J. and Davis, D. K. (2012). Mass Communication Theory. Boston: Wadsworth.

4. Barnhurst, G. K., and Nerone, J. (2009). Journalism History. U: Wahl-Jorgensen, K. and Hanitzsch, T. (eds.). The Handbook of Journalism Studies. London: Routledge. (17-28).

5. Bauman, Z. (2011). Tekuća modernost. Zagreb: Pelago.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3