Affiliation:
1. Institute for Social Research in Zagreb
2. Edward Bernays University of Applied Sciences
Abstract
Debate as a method is increasingly being utilised in both school and
out-of-school settings, aiming to develop certain cognitive, emotional, and
interpersonal skills, while also equipping young people with the
competencies to actively participate in their social and political
communities. Education through debate, as a distinctive form of non-formal
education, is thus becoming an integral part of young people?s lives. The
development of critical thinking, heightened selfesteem, improved rhetoric,
organizational prowess, effective presentation, and argumentation abilities,
along with the fostering of citizenship, play a pivotal role in aiding
underprivileged youth to become more constructive contributors to their
communities. These proficiencies and goals, demonstrated within this paper,
exemplify the diverse skill set that debate fosters. This paper brings the
results of a qualitative study conducted across four countries (Croatia,
Slovenia, Poland, and the Netherlands) regarding the advantages of debate.
It offers empirical evidence that one of the ways to have responsible,
conscious, aware, vigilant, and selfconfident citizens is by incorporating
debate in their (non)formal education.
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Reference52 articles.
1. Aclan, E. M., & Aziz, N. H. A. (2015). Exploring parliamentary debate as a pedagogical tool to develop English communication skills in EFL/ESL classrooms. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.2p.1
2. Akerman, R., & Neale, I. (2011). Debating the evidence: an international review of current situation and perceptions. CfBT Education Trust [in association with] English-Speaking Union. https://fearlessparent.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/ESU_Report_debatingtheevidence_FINAL.pdf
3. Allen, M., et al. (1999). A meta-analysis of the impact of forensics and communication education on critical thinking. Communication Education, 48(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379149
4. Anderson, S., & Mezuk, B. (2012). Participating in a policy debate program and academic achievement among at-risk adolescents in an urban public school district: 1997-2007. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1225-1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.005
5. Bellon, J. (2000). A research-based justification for debate across the curriculum. Argumentation and Advocacy, 36(3), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2000.11951646