Rational red blood cells administration - have we achieved a satisfactory level?

Author:

Lukic Vojislav1,Zivotic Biljana1,Vasiljevic Branislava1,Sabani Almira1,Bogdanovic Gradimir1,Kovac Mirjana2

Affiliation:

1. Blood Transfusion Institute of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia

2. Blood Transfusion Institute of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia + University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia

Abstract

Introduction. The important indicators of the quality of work in blood transfusion banks and health care facilities in general is the ratio of the cross-matched red blood cell (RBC) units, and the number of transfused RBC, known as cross-match to transfusion ratio (C:T). The objective of this research was to provide an assessment of the quality of our work in a cross-sectional study, showing C:T ratios for certain areas of surgery or particular surgical indications. Methods. We analyzed the data related to the activities of the Department for Pre-Transfusion Testing and Blood Distribution at the Blood Transfusion Institute of Serbia during the September and November of 2017 period. In total, 341 patients were included in the study, for whom 1,067 RBC units were requested. Results. In pre-transfusion testing, 562 units were cross-matched and 249 units were transfused. The overall C:T ratio was 2.25. There are variations in C:T by departments. For the departments of abdominal surgery and reanimation, where uncrossmatched RBC units were requested, C:T was < 2. Other departments had C:T > 3 for almost all therapeutic areas. Conclusion. Our results show that the C:T ratio ranged 2.02?3.6, indicating the need to reevaluate the protocols based on which the blood is requested according to individual indications, to adequately prepare patients for surgery in order to reduce the risk of possible allogeneic transfusion, and to apply Patient Blood Management protocols, which include the use of alternatives to allogeneic blood transfusion.

Publisher

National Library of Serbia

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3