Affiliation:
1. Zdravstveni centar „Pirot”, Pirot
2. Dom zdravlja „Leskovac”, Leskovac
3. Dom zdravlja „Voždovac”, Beograd
4. Institut za prevenciju, lečenje i rehabilitaciju reumatskih i kardiovaskularnih bolesti „Niška banja”, Niška Banja
Abstract
Introduction. Considering that dyslipidaemia is an important factor for
cardiovascular diseases, target lipid levels are rarely reached in everyday
clinical practice. Objective. The objective of this study was to evaluate how
often we achieve the treatment goals for the lipid parameters in the diabetic
and non-diabetic patients after the previous myocardial infarction (MI).
Methods. The survey included 118 patients (84 males and 34 females), mean age
59.38?9.86 years, 34 (28.8%) of them diabetics, with the history of MI in the
previous 3 years. The patients were selected from the database of multicentre
prospective interventional study ?Secondary prevention of coronary heart
disease and cerebrovascular diseases?, conducted in 2005 on 1,189 patients in
Serbia. The patients were further followed in the period from 18 (5th visit)
and 36 months (6th visit) after inclusion into the study from 2005-2008.
Their lipid status, the use of lipid-lowering drugs, and the independent
prognostic factors for major adverse coronary events were identified. In the
beginning of the study, all patients were informed about the importance of
lifestyle change and active approach to treatment. The accomplishment of
secondary preventive measures was estimated on the basis of the European
guidelines on secondary prevention of the coronary heart disease. Results.
Three years after introduction of the preventive measures, diabetics had a
higher prevalence of the target levels of the total cholesterol (21.2% vs.
7.6%) and HDL-cholesterol than non-diabetics (100% vs. 87.3%) (p<0.05).
Non-diabetics had significantly higher prevalence of the target levels of
LDL-cholesterol than diabetics (19% vs. 3%) (p<0.05). No significant
differences were found in the prevalence of the treatment goals of
triglycerides in diabetic (42.4%) and non-diabetic patients (60.8%) (p>0.05).
At the end of the study, after applying secondary prevention measures, 27.3%
of diabetics did not use lipid-lowering drugs. The percentage of
non-diabetics using no lipid-lowering drugs was lower (20.3%), but the
difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). By using the method
Enter Cox regression multivariant analysis, the change in the level of
triglycerides, total and LDL-cholesterol were singled out as independent
prognostic factors for major adverse coronary events. Conclusion. Our study
has shown high prevalence of increased plasma concentrations in the total,
LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides and low plasma concentrations of
HDL-cholesterol, as well as the insufficient use of lipid-lowering drugs in
diabetic and non-diabetic patients with previous MI. Decreasing the total
cholesterol and increasing the HDL-cholesterol are significant, decreasing of
triglycerides and LDL-cholesterol does not suffice. Therefore, secondary
prevention measures of cardiovascular events should be intensified,
especially in patients with diabetes.
Publisher
National Library of Serbia