Serbian teachers’ conceptions of different aspects of planning cooperative learning in the classroom

Author:

Bulatovic Marija1ORCID,Medar-Zlatkovic Jelena2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Serbia

2. Institute for Educational Research in Belgrade, Serbia

Abstract

Having in mind the significance of students? mutual cooperation in the learning process, we conducted a study with the aim of understanding teachers? perspectives on different aspects of planning cooperative learning in the classroom. The sample comprised 19 teachers employed at primary and secondary schools in Belgrade, Pancevo, and the municipality of Obrenovac. The data was collected using the interview technique and processed via thematic content analysis. The findings suggest that although teachers shaped cooperative learning by creating different assignments for students, they most often equated this form of learning with one-dimensional peer tutoring. Teachers? contemplations about planning cooperative learning were shaped by numerous stereotypes and misconceptions, whose origin can be linked to deeply rooted elements of the traditional (instructional) method of class organization. We conclude that despite certain teachers? initiatives to implement cooperative learning in our midst, there is a conspicuous lack of understanding of the intertwining dimensions of cooperative learning. Teachers require support that surpasses the usual forms of professional development and encompasses large-scale educational projects connecting schools and scientific institutions and offering teachers longitudinal facilitation in cooperative learning class preparation

Funder

Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia

Publisher

National Library of Serbia

Reference30 articles.

1. Anderson, J., Reder, L., & Simon, H. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25 (4), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025004005

2. Antić, S. (2010). Kooperativno učenje: modeli, potencijali, ograničenja [Cooperative learning: models, potentials, limitations]. Institut za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu.

3. Cohen, E. (1992). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Issues in Restructuring Schools, 2, 4-7.

4. Cohen, E. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups, Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.

5. Cossham, A., & Johanson, G. (2019). The benefits and limitations of using key informants in library and information studies research. Information Research, 24(3). http://InformationR.net/ir/24-3/rails/rails1805.html

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3