Affiliation:
1. Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade, Serbia
Abstract
In-service training programmes are an important mechanism for improving
teachers? competencies in bullying prevention and intervention within the
education system of Serbia. Evaluation of the quality of these programmes is
mainly based on the registration of participants? first impressions after
the completion of training programmes, but there is a lack of reliable data
on their effectiveness, especially on whether such training programmes
provide adequate teacher training on bullying prevention and intervention.
Therefore, this paper presents the results of research aimed at finding out
what members of school Teams for Protection think about the quality of these
programmes after they had the opportunity to apply the acquired knowledge in
practice. The research used a semi-structured interview with three questions
to collect data on the content of the programmes, interviewees? satisfaction
with the quality of the programmes, their opinions on the perceived
shortcomings of the programmes, and suggestions for improvement. For the
research, 42 members of the Teams for Protection in 18 Belgrade secondary
schools were interviewed. In processing the data, qualitative thematic
analysis of the content was conducted, based on statements of the
interviewees. The research findings suggest that the programmes, taken as a
whole, do not provide participants with the necessary competencies to deal
with bullying, although they are potentially effective in some aspects. The
implications of this research relate to the need to change the content of
the programmes and human resources capacities for their application, as well
as to improve the criteria for their accreditation.
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Reference78 articles.
1. Aldrup, K., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., Göllner, R., & Trautwein, U. (2018). Student misbehavior and teacher well-being: Testing the mediating role of the teacher-student relationship. Learning and Instruction, 58, 126-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.05.006.
2. Altun, A., & Gök, B. (2010). Determining in-service training programs’ characteristics given to teachers by conjoint analysis. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1709-1714. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.970.
3. Armitage, R. (2021). Bullying in children: Impact on child health. BMJ Paediatrics Open, 5(1), Article e000939. DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000939.
4. Ayers, S. L., Wagaman, A. M., Geiger, J. M., Bermudez-Parsai, M., & Hedberg, E. C. (2012). Examining school-based bullying interventions using multilevel discrete time hazard modeling. Prevention Science, 13(5), 539-550. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-012-0280-7.
5. Bagwell, C. L., & Bukowski, W. M. (2018). Friendship in childhood and adolescence: Features, effects, and processes. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen & K. H. Rubin (eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 371-390). The Guilford Press.