Vaccine hesitancy in Western and Eastern Europe: The significance of contextual influences

Author:

Trifunovic Vesna1

Affiliation:

1. Etnografski institut SANU, Beograd

Abstract

Using the example of Eastern and Western Europe, the paper points out the importance of contextual influences on decisions and behaviour regarding vaccines and vaccination. Contextual determinants have been identified as important in theorizing the concept of vaccine hesitancy that allows for a comprehensive understanding of the reasons why the public questions vaccines. Therefore, the paper first presents the theoretical elaboration of the aforementioned concept, and then discusses the contextual influences on vaccine hesitancy within the European region in order to showcase the differences that exist in this respect between Western and Eastern Europe, as well as between certain minority communities and the majority population in some Western European countries. In all cases, vaccine hesitancy appears to be a matter of trust which has been further eroded by social, political and economic experiences characteristic for the post-socialist context in Eastern Europe and the conditions in which some minority communities live in Western Europe. The theoretical framework of the concept of vaccine hesitancy is presented according to the report of the SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy, while the presentation of contextual determinants is based on the results of quantitative and qualitative research in different European countries and reviews of studies that focus on these influences.

Funder

Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia

Publisher

National Library of Serbia

Subject

General Medicine

Reference50 articles.

1. Agerberg, Mattias. 2017. “Failed expectations: Quality of government and support for populist parties in Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (3): 578-600.

2. Ali, Karam Adel & Lucia Pastore Celentano. 2017. “Addressing vaccine hesitancy in the ‘post-truth’ era.” Eurohealth 23 (4): 16-20.

3. Appendices to the Report of the SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy 2014. https://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2014/october/2_SAGE_Appendicies_Background_final.pdf (pristupljeno 11. 02. 2021).

4. Baker, Jeffrey P. 2003. “The pertussis vaccine controversy in Great Britain, 1974- 1986.” Vaccine 21: 4003-4010.

5. Bazylevych, Maryna. 2011. “Vaccination Campaigns in Postsocialist Ukraine: Health Care Providers Navigating Uncertainty.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 25 (4): 436-456.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3