Appropriate use of the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance indices

Author:

Ivanov David1,Zubnar Andrea2ORCID,Tapavicki Borislav2ORCID,Janjic Nebojsa3ORCID,Karaba-Jakovljevic Dea2,Naumovic Nada2

Affiliation:

1. University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine Novi Sad

2. University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Novi Sad

3. University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Sad + Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Clinic of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Novi Sad

Abstract

Introduction. Timely detection of insulin resistance is of great importance and a number of indices have been developed for its evaluation, among which the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index is the most commonly used in clinical practice. However, it can be calculated via two different models - homeostasis model assessment 1 and homeostasis model assessment 2. Most studies determine the cut-off values of the study population using the homeostasis model assessment 1, while recently most physicians use homeostasis model assessment 2 in everyday clinical practice. The aim of our study was to examine whether there was a difference in the values of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance and homeostasis model assessment of panceratic beta cells function calculated using these two models. Material and Methods. Laboratory findings of 42 patients who were diagnosed with glycemia and insulinemia were used in this study. Fasting and postprandial glycemia and insulinemia were used to calculate homeostasis model assessment indices using homeostasis model assessment 1 and homeostasis model assessment 2. Results. When comparing the values of the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance and homeostasis model assessment B indices, calculated via homeostasis model assessment 1 and homeostasis model assessment 2, we found a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) which was also obtained when comparing the values of the homeostasis model assessment B index. Linear correlation analysis showed a significant positive correlation between the measured values of the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (calculated via both models) and postprandial insulinemia at 120 minutes (p < 0.005). Conclusion. The results indicate that homeostasis model assessment 2 yields significantly lower homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance and homeostasis model assessment B index values than when calculated by the homeostasis model assessment, which may be a stumbling block in the use of homeostasis model assessment index. It is necessary to pay attention which homeostasis model assessment model was used to define the cut-off values of these indices, and to use the same model in the diagnosis of insulin resistance in each patient in everyday clinical practice.

Publisher

National Library of Serbia

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3