Promises and challenges of deliberative and participatory innovations in hybride regimes: The case of two citizens’ assemblies in Serbia

Author:

Fiket Irena1ORCID,Djordjevic Biljana2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory

2. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Political Science

Abstract

A worrying trend of autocratization that has been spreading globally in recent years, has thrust forward a new wave of appeals for deliberative and participatory democracy as a remedy for the crisis. With a few exceptions, the majority of participatory and deliberative institutions were implemented in stable democracies. The efforts to institutionalize participatory and deliberative models are almost completely absent in Serbia and other Western Balkan countries. Yet, there has been a trend of citizen mobilization in the form of social movements and local civic initiatives, which are both a symptom of unresponsive and quite openly authoritarian institutions, as well as a potential pathway to democratization. The pace and scope of these developments in the undemocratic societies of the Western Balkan region, in terms of both bottom up and top-down democratic experimentation, call for a better understanding of their internal dynamics, and their social and political impact. Responding to this need, the articles in the special issue focus on social movement mobilizations and deliberative experimentation. To begin with, our introductory article focuses particularly on understanding the possible role deliberative institutions could have in hybrid regimes. It looks at the first two cases of deliberative mini publics (DMPs) ever organized in Serbia, analyzing their rationale, specific design, implementation, as well as considering the possible role deliberative institutions could play in the hybrid regime of Serbia.

Publisher

National Library of Serbia

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy

Reference72 articles.

1. Alizada, Nazifa et al. (2021), Autocratization Turns Viral. Democracy Report 2021, University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute.

2. Barabas, Jason (2004), “How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions”, American Political Science Review 98 (4): 687-701.

3. Burnell, Peter J. (2007), Does International Democracy Promotion Work?, Discussion Paper / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik 2007/17, Bonn: DIE.

4. Cohen, Joshua (1989), “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy”, in Alan Hamlin, Philip Pettit (eds.), The Good Polity. Normative Analysis of the State, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 17-34.

5. -. (1997), “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy”, in James Bohman, William Rehg (eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, pp. 67-91.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3