Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Biology, Institute of Zoology, Belgrade
Abstract
The purpose of this note is to offer some corrections and supplements to the
paper of Lohaj et al. (2013), to prove the validity of recently described
trechine genera in Serbia, and to comment on other erroneous facts presented
in the analyzed paper. In particular, we will show that the taxonomical
remarks on the genus Duvalius Delarouz?e, 1859, are wrong. The following
genera are clearly delimited and represent valid taxa: Serboduvalius Curcic,
Pavicevic & Curcic, 2001, comb. n., Rascioduvalius Curcic, Brajkovic, Mitic &
Curcic, 2003, comb. n., Curcicia Curcic & Brajkovic, 2003, comb. n., and
Javorella Curcic, Brajkovic & Curcic, 2003, comb. n. The following new
combinations are established for the following Duvalius species:
Serboduvalius gejzadunayi (Lohaj, Cepl?k & Lakota, 2013), comb. n., S.
starivlahi (Gu?orguiev, Curcic & Curcic, 2000), comb. n., S. dragacevensis
Curcic, Pavicevic & Curcic, 2001, comb. n., S. droveniki (Magrini, 1998),
comb. n., Rascioduvalius cvijici (Jeannel, 1923), comb. n., R. stopicensis
(Jeannel, 1923), comb. n., R. zlatiborensis Curcic, Brajkovic & Curcic, 2005,
comb. n., Curcicia bolei (Pretner, 1963), comb. n., Javorella javorensis
Curcic, Brajkovic & Curcic, 2003, comb. n., J. suvoborensis (Pavicevic &
Popovic, 2001), comb. n., and J. suvodolensis Curcic, Brajkovic & Curcic,
2003, comb. n.
Funder
Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology