Affiliation:
1. Faculty of philosophy, University of Belgrade
Abstract
In the paper I argue against content pluralism as a solution of one specific
problem Corazza and Korta deal with in their joint paper ?Frege on subject
matter and identity statements? (Analysis, 2015). Corazza and Korta test the
idea of content plurality by its capacity to deal with Frege?s puzzle about
identity statements but, I will claim, it doesn?t pass the test. In
particular, I propose an understanding of subject matter in Frege as related
to his judgment stroke. I distinguish two senses of ?subject matter? in
Corazza and Korta, and argue that their solution of Frege?s puzzle is
inconsistent.
Funder
Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Reference12 articles.
1. Brandom, R. (2000) Articulating Reasons, Cambridge Mass, Harvard University Press.
2. Corazza, E., Korta, K. (2015) “Frege on subject matter and identity statements.” Analysis 75(4): 562-565.
3. Ebert, P.A. and Rossberg, M. (2009) “Cantor on Frege’s Foundations of Arithmetic.” History and Philosophy of Logic 30(4): 341-348.
4. Frege, G. (1879) Begriffsschrift. Halle, Verlag von Louis Nebert.
5. Frege, G. (1892) “Über Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, NF 100: 25-50.