Affiliation:
1. Akademija strukovnih studija, Odsek za vaspitače i medicinske sestre vaspitače, Šabac
Abstract
In this paper, I will consider certain specificities of psychotic discourse.
Specifically, relying on classical, contemporary psychoanalysis and
linguistics, I will unravel the logic behind the production of neologisms,
which represent one of the basic features of the speech of psychotic
patients. The paper indicates the importance of taking into account both
semantic and prosodic aspects of the patient?s speech. The main thesis is
the interdependence of the integrative capacities of the subject of
analytical experience (identity) and his ability to speak. The absence of
capacity for dialogue, that is, ?intentional symbolic exchange?, is
considered a consequence of severe structural deficiencies of the speaker.
That incommunicableness (idiosyncrasy) of speech will be presented through
the examples of Friedrich H?lderlin and James Joyce.
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Reference27 articles.
1. Arnhajm, Rudolf (1985). Vizuelno mišljenje jedinstvo slike i pojma (Beograd: Univerzitet umetnosti).
2. Chafe, Wallace (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing (University of Chicago Press).
3. Chafe, Wallace (1987). „Cognitive constraints on information flow.” Coherence and grounding in discourse 11: 21-51.
4. Chaika, Elaine (1990). Understanding psychotic speech: Beyond Freud and Chomsky (Charles C Thomas, Publisher)
5. Džojs, Džejms (2014). Uliks (Beograd: Geopoetika)