Selfish genes or selfish memes: The effect of genetic relatedness versus value similarity on altruism
-
Published:2022
Issue:4
Volume:55
Page:379-395
-
ISSN:0048-5705
-
Container-title:Psihologija
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Psihologija
Author:
Baucal Aleksandar1ORCID, Lazic Aleksandra1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, Serbia
Abstract
Two preregistered quasi-experiments disentangled the effects of selfish genes and selfish memes on participants? self-reported willingness to help in hypothetical everyday-favor and life-or-death situations. Memes were operationalized as the perceived level of similarity in important attitudes and values between the person participating in the study and a selected target person, assessed and reported by the participant. In Study 1 (N = 761), altruism was highest for siblings, and then for cousins and nonkin; greater memetic similarity was also associated with greater altruism; and the interaction between the factors was not significant. In Study 2 (N = 841), conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, altruism was highest for siblings, but the same for cousins and nonkin; the effect of memetic similarity was replicated; and the interaction term remained insignificant. Both studies controlled for a range of demographic and social relationship characteristics, suggesting a potentially relevant role of future contact probability and emotional closeness. We propose that, similarly to gene selfishness, meme selfishness can also bring about altruism: individuals would rather make a personal sacrifice to help memetically similar than dissimilar others because similar others have a higher chance of spreading the helper?s memes.
Funder
Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Subject
General Psychology
Reference41 articles.
1. Aktipis, A., Cronk, L., Alcock, J., Ayers, J. D., Baciu, C., Balliet, D., Boddy, A. M., Curry, O. S., Krems, J. A., Muñoz, A., Sullivan, D., Sznycer, D., Wilkinson, G. S., & Winfrey, P. (2018). Understanding cooperation through fitness interdependence. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(7), 429-431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0378-4 2. Ayers, J. D., Sznycer, D., Sullivan, D., Guevara Beltrán, D., Van den Akker, O., Muñoz, A., Hruschka, D. J., Cronk, L., & Aktipis, A. (2020, May). A new measure of perceived interdependence: Factor structure and validity. (Preprint). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7yzhd 3. Balliet, D., Wu, J., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1556-1581. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037737 4. Baucal, A., & Lazić, A. (2018, March). Sebični geni ili sebični memi [Selfish genes or selfish memes]. Paper presented at the 24th Empirical Studies in Psychology, Belgrade, Serbia. http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2018-KNJIGA-REZIMEA.pdf 5. Betzig, L. L., & Turke, P. W. (1986). Food sharing on Ifaluk. Current Anthropology, 27(4), 397-400. https://doi.org/10.1086/203457
|
|