The effect of space allowance in the cage and floor systems on feather condition and egg production
-
Published:2022
Issue:2
Volume:38
Page:125-137
-
ISSN:1450-9156
-
Container-title:Biotehnologija u stocarstvu
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BIOTEC ANIM HUSB
Author:
Skrbic Zdenka1ORCID, Lukic Milos1ORCID, Petricevic Veselin1ORCID, Bogosavljevic-Boskovic Snezana2ORCID, Rakonjac Simeon2ORCID, Doskovic Vladimir2ORCID, Tolimir Natasa3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Institute for Animal Husbandry, Belgrade-Zemun, Republic of Serbia 2. Faculty of Agronomy, University of Kragujevac, Čačak, Republic of Serbia 3. Institute of Science Application in Agriculture, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia
Abstract
The egg production sector is in a transitional period with regard to the
permitted housing systems, i.e. rearing in conventional cages under certain
conditions to the complete ban of any form of cage system. The changes were
caused by concern for the layer wellfare but with the expected effects on
productivity as well. The aim of the research was to determine the effects
of the floor space allowance in cage and non-cage housing systems on the
feather score and egg production of laying hens of three ages, from the
aspect of the regulated minimum and optimal space in the cage system (C) and
the space provided in the extensive rearing system with hens in smaller
groups in the facility (extensive indoor -EI). In order to determine the
feather score, the body weight of the laying hens and the weight of the
eggs, three groups of laying hens were formed: C4 (564 cm2 per hen, cage
system), C3 (751 cm2 per hen, cage system) and EI ( 3000 cm2 per hen,
extensive indoor). The feather score and body weight of laying hens were
determined in three ages of hens (30, 40, 50 weeks), by individual
assessment and measurement of all hens in the experiment. The hen-day egg
production and egg weight were determined in the same weeks of laying age.
In addition to the expected decrease in feather score with the age of hens,
results indicated a significant interaction between age and space allowance
per hen. Observed by individual body parts, as well as based on the overall
feather score, the space allowance per hen exhibited a full, cumulative
effect at 50 weeks of age. Based on the space allowance, it was possible to
rank the overall feather score, with the laying hens with the most space
having the best feather score. The effect of the space allowance on the body
weight of the laying hens was manifested through the space available on the
feeder, which resulted in the lowest (p<0.01) body weight values recorded in
laying hens of the C4 group. Egg production was not significantly influenced
by the space allowance per hen (p=0.069), but a connection between egg
production and the housing system can be concluded. The average egg weight,
in addition to the known effect of layer age, was the lowest (p<0.01) in the
group with the least space allowance per hen.
Funder
Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Reference19 articles.
1. CAMPE A., HOES C., KOESTERS S., FROEMKE C., BOUGEARD S., STAACK M., BESSEI W., MANTON A., SCHOLZ B., SCHRADER L., THOBE P., KNIERIM U. (2018): Analysis of the influences on plumage condition in laying hens: How suitable is a whole body plumage score as an outcome? Poultry Science, 97, 358-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex321 2. DAIGLE C.L., RODENBURG T.B., BOLHUIS J.E., SWANSON J.C., SIEGFORD J.M. (2015): Individual consistency of feather pecking behavior in laying hens: once a feather pecker always a feather pecker? Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2, 6, 1-12. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00006 3. DECINA C., BERKE O., VAN STAAVEREN N., BAES C.F., WIDOWSKI T.M., HARLANDER-MATAUSCHEK A. (2019): A cross-sectional study on feather cover damage in Canadian laying hens in noncage housing systems. BMC Veterinary Research, 15, 435, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2168-2 4. DIKMEN B.Y., IPEK A., SAHAN U., PETEK M., SOZCU A. (2016): Egg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range). Poultry Science, 95,1564-1572. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew082 5. FIDAN E.D., NAZLIGUL A. (2013): Cage position and density effect on some welfare criteria in Denizli chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 83, 645- 648.
|
|