Comparison of experimental and simulated responses of TL and OSL dosimeters in poly-energetic and multi-directional photon radiation fields-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of experimental and simulated responses of TL and OSL dosimeters in poly-energetic and multi-directional photon radiation fields

Published:2021 Issue:4 Volume:36 Page:329-337
ISSN:1451-3994
Container-title:Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection
language:en
Short-container-title:NUCL TECH RAD PROT

Author:

Apostolakopoulos Filip¹,Krzanovic Nikola²,Bozovic Predrag²,Stankovic Koviljka¹,Perazic Luka³

Affiliation:

1. School of Electrical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

2. Department of Radiation and Environmental Protection, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

3. Public Company Nuclear Facilities of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine the energy and angular responses of thermoluminescent (LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P) and optically stimulated luminescent (Al2O3:C) dosimeters with experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. Nine radiation qualities, with mean energies ranging from 33 keV to 1.25 MeV, and five angles of incidence, between 0? and 80?, were used to conduct this analysis. The IEC 62387:2020 international radiation protection standard was used as the dosimeter response measure of quality. The experimental and simulated data exhibit that the dosimeter responses meet the standard's criteria, with certain exceptions on lower energies.

Publisher

National Library of Serbia

Subject

Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Nuclear Energy and Engineering

Reference24 articles.

1. Ponmalar, R., et al., Dosimetric Characterization of Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter with Therapeutic Photon Beams for Use in Clinical Radiotherapy Measurements, Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 13 (2017), 2, pp. 304-312

2. Liang, Q., et al., Investigation of the Relative TL Response for Low-Energy X-Rays Relative to 60Co for TLD-100, Radiation Measurements, 46 (2011), 12, pp. 1453-1456

3. Malthez, A. L., et al., Experimental Photon Energy Response of Different Dosimetric Materials for a Dual Detector System Combining Thermoluminescence and Optically Stimulated Luminescence, Radiation Measurements, 71 (2014), Dec., pp. 133-138

4. Stanković, J. S., et al., Review of the Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Method for the Environmental Dose Monitoring, Nucl Technol Radiat, 36 (2021), 2, pp. 150-162

5. Apostolakopoulos, F. H., et al., Response of TL and OSL Passive Personal Dosimetry Systems in Poly-Energetic and Multi-Directional Photon Radiation Fields, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 151 (2019), Sept., pp. 235-241

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pulsed photoluminescence measurements using salt as a radiation accident dose detector material;Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection;2023

2. Comparison of calibration factors for field-class dosimeters;Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection;2022