The outcome and prognosis following the surgical intervention in patients with severe aortic stenosis with respecttothe presence and severity of associated aortic regurgitation

Abstract

INTRODUCTION It is not clear whether associated aortic regurgitation (AR) should be regarded as a risk factor in patients undergoing surgery for severe aortic stenosis (AS). Some authors have suggested that morbidity and mortality are increased in these patients as compared to patients operated for pure AS, whereas others have found no difference of the outcome and prognosis between these groups. OBJECTIVE This study made an attempt to compare the outcome and prognosis following the surgical intervention in patients with severe AS and associated AR and those operated for pure AS, as well as to determine predictive value of clinical, functional and echocardiographic data for the outcome of surgery. METHODS Study population consisted of 122 consecutive patients operated at Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute during 1999 due to severe AS, defined as mean gradient over aortic valve >30 mmHg. The patients were divided into AS group (63 patients with AS without AR or with mild AR) and AS+AR group (59 patients with AS and moderate, severe or very severe AR). The patients were subjected to control clinical, functional and echocardiographic examinations 12 and 18 months following the surgery. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Preoperatively, the patients in AS group were older and had coronary artery disease more frequently, whereas patients in AS+AR group had higher left ventricular volumes and mass. Preoperative NYHA class, ejection fraction, mean gradient over aortic valve, type and size of the implanted mechanical prosthesis, and the incidence of associated coronary artery bypass surgery were similar between the groups. Similarly, the operative mortality was similar in AS and AS+AR groups (1.6% vs 8.5%, respectively, p=0.11). Twelve months postoperatively, there were no difference of average NYHA class and NYHA class III/ IV between the groups. The patients in AS+AR group were unable to walk >300 meters on 6 minute walk test more frequently than those in AS group (64% vs. 36%, respectively; p=0.043). Eighteen months postoperatively, NYHA class III/IV was found more frequently in AS+AR than in AS group (26% vs. 8%, respectively; p=0.0343). In patients with associated AR, there was no difference of NYHA class with respect to the severity of AR (p=0.815). Multivariate analysis found the association of more than mild AR as an independent predictor of poor functional capacity, irrespective of its severity. CONCLUSION Patients with severe AS and associated AR have poorer postoperative functional capacity as compared to patients operated for pure AS.