Head-to-head comparison of clinical, biochemical and functional effects of fosinopril and enalapril in patients with systolic heart failure

Author:

Otasevic Petar1,Putnikovic Biljana2,Vukajlovic Zelimir3,Ilisic Bojan4,Neskovic Aleksandar1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institut za kardiovaskularne bolesti Dedinje, Centar za kardiovaskularna istraživanja 'Dr Aleksandar D. Popović', Medicinski fakultet, Beograd

2. Kliničko-bolnički centar Zemun - Kardiološko odeljenje, Medicinski fakultet, Beograd

3. Institut za kardiovaskularne bolesti Dedinje, Centar za kardiovaskularna istraživanja 'Dr Aleksandar D. Popović', Beograd

4. Kliničko-bolnički centar Zemun - Kardiološko odeljenje

Abstract

Introduction. The aim of this study was to evaluate short-term clinical, bio?chemical and functional effects of fosinopril versus enalapril in patients with heart failure. Material and methods. 59 consecutive patients (mean age 57?8 years, EF 18.9?6.3%, NYHA III or IV class 19/59) -were randomized to receive fosinopril or enalapril for three months. All patients underwent echocardiography, metabolic testing, and a 6-minute walk test and completed the Minnesota questionnaire on inclusion and three months later. Additionally, serum creatinine, BUN, total cholesterol and triglycerides were measured. Kaplan-Meier curve was created to assess event-free survival for cardiac death and hospitalization for heart failure. Results. There was no statistically significant difference in event-free survival between patients on fosinopril and enalapril (86.7% vs. 82.8%, log rank 4.21 p=0.43). However, time to the event was longer in patients on fosinopril (77.0?25.35 vs. 40.2?6.8days, p=0.04). At the end of the study, no difference between fosinopril and enalapril group existed with respect to maximal oxygen consumption (20.90?4.47 vs. 20.89?6.86 ml/kg/mm), ejection fraction (20.5?7.4 vs. 2L4?7.8%), distance during the 6-minute test walk (313?74 vs. 352?129 meters) and quality of life (23.8?15.8 vs. 25.6?20.3 points), but patients on enalapril had higher creatinine (99?13 vs. 113?17 umol/L, p=0.002) and BUN (7.28?1.7vs. 8.89?2.39 mmol/L, p=0.01) levels. Increase in fosinopril dose during the study was higher than increase in enalapril dose (24.1%?23.8% vs. 9.5?24.5%, p=0.04). Conclusions. Fosinopril and enalapril have similar short-term effects on event-free survival, ejection fraction, functional capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure. Patients on fosinopril presented with longer survival without event and had lower creatinine and BUN at the end of the follow-up. Additionally, fosinopril can be easily titrated to the maximum therapeutic dose. .

Publisher

National Library of Serbia

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Drugs Targeting RAAS in the Treatment of Hypertension and Other Cardiovascular Diseases;Pathophysiology and Pharmacotherapy of Cardiovascular Disease;2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3