Affiliation:
1. Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore whether Maria Kronfeldner?s analysis of
human nature could be applied to the concept of cognitive systems and
related capabilities, such as the human language faculty. Firstly, I will
address the nature-nurture debate, that is, explanatory claims of nature as
having a role in causing the language ability, and explanatory claims of
culture as responsible for the development of human language capabilities.
The nature-nurture divide generates a problem since it overlooks the
interaction of nature and culture during the development of language
capabilities, the problem called the developmentalist challenge. I will
demonstrate different standpoints that try to answer this challenge, most
famously the constructivist theory of Jean Piaget and the theory of
universal grammar of Noam Chomsky. Following the insights of Kronfeldner, if
we opt for an explanatory (and not classificatory or descriptive) account of
the human language, we will search for the explanatory epistemic roles and
their fulfilments. As Kronfeldner states, different sciences search for
different differences regarding explanandum, and I hope to show that the
integrative interdisciplinary framework dealing with cognitive systems is
needed. The conclusion is that biolinguistics is an interdisciplinary field
with a necessary unifying potential regarding explanatory account of the
human language faculty.
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Reference39 articles.
1. Abrahamsen, Adele, and William Bechtel. 2006. “Phenomena and Mechanisms: Putting the Symbolic, Connectionist, and Dynamical Systems Debate in Broader Perspective.” In: Stainton, Robert, ed. Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
2. Barkow, Jerome H, Leda Cosmides, and John Tooby. 1992. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Boeckx, Cedric. 2014. “The Roots of Current Biolinguistic Thought: Revisiting the ‘Chomsky-Piaget Debate’ in the Context of the Revival of Biolinguistic.” Teorema XXXIII/1: 83-94.
4. Chalmers, David. 2010. The Character of Consciousness. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5. Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.