Comparing inoculation methods for in vitro evaluation of resistance to blackleg disease in potato cultivars
Author:
Azadmanesh Sima1, Mozafari Javad2, Hasanzadeh Nader1, Moslemkhani Cobra3
Affiliation:
1. Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food Industries, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran 2. National Gene Bank of Iran, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Karaj, Iran 3. Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute. Agricultural Research, education and Extension Organization (AREEO). Tehran, Iran
Abstract
To find the best inoculation method for evaluation of the resistance in
potato genotypes against bacterial blackleg caused by Pectobacterium
atrosepticum under in vitro conditions, five inoculation methods were
compared. In vitro grown explants of five potato genotypes were inoculated
with different inoculation methods, then placed on MS solid medium and
incubated at 23?C with 70% relative humidity under the light regime of 16
hours a day. After the appearance of symptoms, the efficiency of inoculation
methods was then recorded based on the severity of disease symptoms in
potato genotypes: Farmosa, Agria, Picaso, Marfona and a wild potato genotype
?Solanum phureja'. Plantlets inoculated by piercing the crown with sterile
toothpick inoculated in bacterial suspension of 108 cfu/ml showed the most
severe symptoms. Based on all experiments, cultivar Marfona showed higher
resistance among all cultivars and, cultivar Agria was the most susceptible.
Finally, after witnessing the reactions of different varieties to
inoculation methods and comparing them with previous evaluations of
resistance in greenhouse conditions, the crown treatment employing sterile
toothpick after infection in 108 cfu/ml bacterial suspension was selected
and introduced as the best evaluation method of in vitro potato explants
against blackleg.
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Subject
Plant Science,Genetics
Reference23 articles.
1. ALLEFS, J., W., VAN DOOUEWEERT, E., DE JONG, W., PRUMMEL, J., HOOGENDOORN (1995): Factors Affecting Potato Soft Rot Resistance to Pectolytic Erwinia Species in a Tuber Slice Assay. Journal of Phytopathology, 143: 705-711. 2. AZADMANESH, S., J., MOZAFARI, N., HASANZADEH, C., MOSLEMKHANI (2015): In Vitro Evaluation of Resistant of Potato Cultivars against Black Leg Disease (Pectobacterium Atrosepticum), pp. 1087-1094 in Biological Forum-An International Journal. 3. BAGHERI, A., D., ZAFARI (2005): Evaluation and Identification of Potato Varieties Resistance to Black Leg (Soft Rot) Disease. 4. CARPUTO, D., T., CARDI, M., SPEGGIORIN, A., ZOINA, L., FRUSCIANTE (1997): Resistance to Blackleg and Tuber Soft Rot in Sexual and Somatic Interspecific Hybrids with Different Genetic Background. American potato journal, 74: 161-172. 5. CZAJKOWSKI, R., M.C., PEROMBELON, J.A. VAN VEEN, J.M., VAN DER WOLF (2011): Control of Blackleg and Tuber Soft Rot of Potato Caused by Pectobacterium and Dickeya Species: A Review. Plant pathology, 60: 999-1013.
|
|