Affiliation:
1. Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
Abstract
One of the biggest and most important mountain ranges in Europe, the
Carpathians, is being threatened by different human activities. The
Framework Convention on the Protection and Sustainable Development of the
Carpathians (the Carpathian Convention) represents one of the international
efforts to protect the biodiversity of this area through multilateral
cooperation. Serbia is one of the signatory parties, where the area
protected by the Convention currently coincides with the Djerdap National
Park (DjNP) boundaries. Serbia mainly lags in protocol and amendment
ratifications, which is suspected to hinder the potential benefits regarding
the sustainable development of this region. By analyzing the selected
sustainability indicators for the years 2003, 2011, and 2019 we tried to
enlighten if developments were sustainable. The data were also presented by
the spider evaluation method. Despite certain limitations in data
availability, research showed that there are positive economic and
environmental changes, despite depopulation and aging of local inhabitants.
However, major efforts are still to be undertaken, especially regarding
environmental sustainability and implementation of national and
international regulation.
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Subject
Geology,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference48 articles.
1. Abrahams, G. (2017). Constructing definitions of sustainable development. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 6(1), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-03-2017-0009
2. Andersen, I. (2020). The Carpathian Convention: a push to implementation, speech. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/speech/carpathian-convention-push-implementation
3. Baycan-Levent, T., Brunisma, F., & Nijkamp, P. (2007). Urban Spiders: A Comparative Framework for Evaluation and Scenario Analysis. In M. Deakin, G. Mitchell, P. Nijkamp, & R. Vreeker (Eds.), Sustainable Urban Development Volume 2, The Environmental Assessment Methods (pp. 236-253). Taylor & Francis.
4. Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2018). Sustainability Indicators Past and Present: What Next? Sustainability, 10(5), Article 1688. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051688
5. Caponi, V. (2017). The effects of public sector employment on the economy. IZA World of Labor, 332, 1-10. http://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.332
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献