Affiliation:
1. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Prosthodontics, Belgrade, Serbia
Abstract
Emergence profile of implant-supported crowns is defined by the
characteristics of supracrestal connective tissue (SCT), located between the
implant platform and cervical soft tissue margin. This paper reflects the
soft tissue contour management of implant-supported screw-retained crowns
and the transfer of emergence profile using an indirectly customized
impression coping. A 27-year-old male was referred for endosseus implant
placement (Straumann BLT 0 4.1 mm ? 12 mm) in a region of a maxillary right
central and lateral incisor. Teeth were extracted due to a cystic formation
in the mentioned region. Following the delayed implant loading protocol,
implants were exposed, and provisional crowns were fabricated to support
marginal mucosa and papillae and to mimic the contralateral site. During the
three months of temporization, three-dimensional peri-implant soft tissue
changes were validated, and temporary crowns were re-contoured every two
weeks to obtain dynamic compression. When adequate soft tissue architecture
was achieved, the impression for definitive crowns was taken using
customized transfer technique to be able to register the emergence profile
of provisional crowns. This case report described a soft tissue management
technique, where remodeling the provisional restoration allowed soft tissue
to be reshaped. Individual transfer impression technique provides an
accurately captured emergence profile of the soft tissue contours around
implants in the aesthetic zone. This technique enables contouring of the
transmucosal part of the definitive restoration according to the results
obtained by individual dynamic compression, which leads to healthy soft
tissue contours as well as satisfactory aesthetic results.
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Reference25 articles.
1. Al-Rethia R, Al-Dayel A. Soft Tissue Management around Implant in the Esthetic Zone: A Case Report. Int J Dent Sci Res. 2021;9(1):6- 10. [DOI: 10.12691/ijdsr-9-1-2]
2. González-Martín O, Lee E, Weisgold A, Veltri M, Su H. Contour Management of Implant Restorations for Optimal Emergence Profiles: Guidelines for Immediate and Delayed Provisional Restorations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020;40(1):61-70. [DOI: 10.11607/prd.4422] [PMID: 31815974]
3. Kois JC, Kan JY. Predictable peri-implant gingival aesthetics: surgical and prosthodontic rationales. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2001;13(9):691-8; quiz 700, 721-2. [PMID: 11862920]
4. Salvi GE, Aglietta M, Eick S, Sculean A, Lang NP, Ramseier CA. Reversibility of experimental peri-implant mucositis compared with experimental gingivitis in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(2):182-90. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02220.x] [PMID: 21806683]
5. Nemcovsky CE, Moses O. Rotated palatal flap. A surgical approach to increase keratinized tissue width in maxillary implant uncovering: technique and clinical evaluation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002;22(6):607-12. [PMID: 12516832]