Molecular diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: Prevalence of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae in pregnant women

Author:

Matic Snezana1,Nenadic Dane2,Cukic Jelena3ORCID,Mijailovic Zeljko4,Manojlovic Nevena5,Sazdanovic Predrag6,Pavlovic Milos7,Baskic Dejan8,Zivanovic Aleksandar6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Center Kragujevac, Department of Microbiology, Kragujevac

2. Military Medical Academy, Department of Gynecology, Belgrade

3. Public Health Institute, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Kragujevac

4. Clinical Center Kragujevac, Clinic for Infectious diseases, Kragujevac

5. Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kragujevac, Doctoral academic studies

6. Clinical Center Kragujevac, Department of Gynecology, Kragujevac

7. Infinity Family Medicine Clinic, Dubai, UAE

8. Public Health Institute, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Kragujevac + Faculty of Medical Sciences, Center for Molecular Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Kragujevac

Abstract

Introduction/Objective. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is defined as disequilibrium of vaginal microbiota due to proliferation of Gram-negative/variable anaerobes and reduction/depletion of vaginal lactobacilli. Difficulties in interpreting microscopically categorized findings in diagnosis of BV need a molecular analysis of bacteria present in vaginal discharge of patients. In this regard, we performed real-time qPCR analysis of vaginal discharge samples with the goal to explore in which extent prevalence and amount of anaerobes, Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae, are related to findings obtained by microscopy. Methods. This study enrolled 111 asymptomatic pregnant women between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy. Gram-stained vaginal smears were evaluated microscopically. Afterwards, DNA of bacteria was extracted from Gram slides and real-time qPCR was performed with the aim to detect and quantify G. vaginalis and A. vaginae. Results. The data of our study showed that 53.2% of patients had normal results, while 20.7% and 26.1% of patients had intermediary (IMD) and BV results, respectively. G. vaginalis and A. vaginae were more frequently found in IMD and BV than in healthy patients; also, the average bacterial number of G. vaginalis and A. vaginae were significantly higher in BV and IMD than in the group with normal findings (p = 0.000). Comparing mutual relation of G. vaginalis and A. vaginae, the prevalence and number of G. vaginalis were in all groups significantly higher than A. vaginae. Conclusion. The data of our study have shown that in distinguishing normal from BV findings, quantification of bacteria may be more important than just molecular detection of bacteria.

Funder

Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia

Publisher

National Library of Serbia

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3